|
|
#1
10-08-2005, 04:04 PM
|
|||
|
|||
stars 5/10
Because eurobet seems to be down temporarily as I write this, I decided to play some pokerstars 5/10, six-max, for the first time ever. (I used to play lower levels there, a while ago, until moving to 5/10.)
This is probably just luck of the draw. But at 2 tables I've been playing, the players are unbelievably passive: it's a combo of loose/passive and tight/passive. My experience at party was that the players there were actually more aggressive, if you can believe it. Is this play typical for stars 5/10? 
|
|
#3
10-08-2005, 04:21 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: stars 5/10
I used to play Stars 5/10 exclusively. It's generally a weak-tight game that rewards dumb aggression a lot more than Party does. Not getting rakeback sucks though.
|
|
#5
10-08-2005, 05:51 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: stars 5/10
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Not getting rakeback sucks though. [/ QUOTE ] If stars offered rakeback i think they would far surpass the party network in number of players during peak times. [/ QUOTE ]
|
|
#6
10-08-2005, 08:54 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: stars 5/10
I found it mostly nitty when I played there (short sample).
|
|
#7
10-09-2005, 08:08 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: stars 5/10
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Not getting rakeback sucks though. [/ QUOTE ] If stars offered rakeback i think they would far surpass the party network in number of players during peak times. [/ QUOTE ] So now that rakeback is disappearing, perhaps stars will be the place to be afterall.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
