Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > News, Views, and Gossip
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-13-2005, 06:40 PM
bogey bogey is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tahoe and Philadelphia
Posts: 24
Default La Reve or O?

I want to take the gf to see one of these two shows when I'm in Vegas for the WSOP. Anyone seen both? Is one better than the other? I'm leaning towards La Reve just since its newer. Any input is appreciated. Thanks!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-13-2005, 07:36 PM
Daliman Daliman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 382
Default Re: La Reve or O?

See O, and it isn't close.

O is considered the best overall of all the Cirque shows, although Mystere is considered a better value and almost equally as good for 2/3rds the price. Le Reve opened to several bad reviews, and by most accounts, is a mess in sore need of retooling, which I hear it is getting.

Still, until the waters look clearer, DEFINITLY O. Or even Mystere. Actaully, KA is also supposed to be incredible. But not Le Reve. Zumanity is supposed to be pretty good, but a bit over-the-top in its sexuality, in all kinds of sexuality. If 2 guys kissing makes you squeamish, don't see it, goes the standard line.

P.S. Le Reve is NOT a Cirque du Soliel show, as most think. It is similar, and I believe has the same architect, Dragone, of many cirque shows as well as Celine Dion's show A New Day.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-13-2005, 07:40 PM
NoRiverRats NoRiverRats is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Ontario
Posts: 7
Default Re: La Reve or O?

What he said. O is spectacular and I have heard similar concerns/complaints about Le Reve. Going to see KA Saturday night!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-13-2005, 09:31 PM
poker327 poker327 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 179
Default Re: La Reve or O?

I read on alt.vacations.las-vegas that Steve Wynn didn't like Le Reve, so they changed half of it.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-13-2005, 10:54 PM
bogey bogey is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Tahoe and Philadelphia
Posts: 24
Default Thanks! Also what about seats??

Thanks for the input guys. The only problem is now it seems like the only seats I can get for O for the date I need are what they call "limited view". That doesn't sound too good. Are most of the seats in the theater good or should I stay away?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-14-2005, 12:42 PM
StevieG StevieG is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Baltimore, MD, USA
Posts: 157
Default Re: Thanks! Also what about seats??

Have not been to "O", but a quick search found that most people who had limited view seats like the show anyway. Ask yourself how fussy you are, and how much this might get on your nerves. If you are the kind that gets in a huff and can't enjoy a movie when someone sits in front of you, limited view is probably a bad idea.

For what it's worth, here are some comments on the limited view seats:

favorable:

post (scroll to bottom)
post

trip report

unfavorable:
post
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-14-2005, 01:58 PM
chrisdhal chrisdhal is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Twin Cities, MN
Posts: 12
Default Re: Thanks! Also what about seats??

I just got back from Vegas 10 days ago and saw "O" in "limited view" seats.

Awesome.

The "limited view" only blocked a small part of the stage, nothing in the water or the air. The blockage was from the handrail and it really wasn't a big deal. They don't do much on the front stage anyway.

I wouldn't worry about it, go see it. It's incredible.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:07 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.