Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Books and Publications
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-28-2005, 04:54 PM
henkeee henkeee is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2
Default Book for NL. Better book than Harrington\'s for regular NL?

Hi!

I'm looking for a NL book. I'm new to NL, but I don't want easy reading. I want the best NL book! Harrington's seems to be liked by many, but is there a better book if you're not especially interested in tournaments?

/henke
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-28-2005, 05:45 PM
Rudbaeck Rudbaeck is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 555
Default Re: Book for NL. Better book than Harrington\'s for regular NL?

Pot Limit & No Limit by Reuben and Ciaffone.
SuperSystem 2, the section by Doyle Brunson.

Both are required reading, but moving from the text to actual application in games can be hard work. Plenty is left for you to work out yourself.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-28-2005, 05:59 PM
jtnt1096 jtnt1096 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 45
Default Re: Book for NL. Better book than Harrington\'s for regular NL?

[ QUOTE ]
Pot Limit & No Limit by Reuben and Ciaffone.
SuperSystem 2, the section by Doyle Brunson.

Both are required reading, but moving from the text to actual application in games can be hard work. Plenty is left for you to work out yourself.

[/ QUOTE ]

I Agree. Those are the two books I recommend when friends ask about NL cash game books.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-28-2005, 06:01 PM
maurile maurile is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 95
Default Re: Book for NL. Better book than Harrington\'s for regular NL?

[ QUOTE ]
Pot Limit & No Limit by Reuben and Ciaffone.
SuperSystem 2, the section by Doyle Brunson.

[/ QUOTE ]
Both are excellent, but I wouldn't say they're necessarily better than Harrington's first book (which is very good even if you're not interested in tournaments).

Just read all three.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-28-2005, 07:41 PM
henkeee henkeee is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 2
Default Re: Book for NL. Better book than Harrington\'s for regular NL?

Thanks!

But I'm only going to buy one now, since I also will buy a new
limit book (I will probably play mostly limit in the future too). So, if you would buy only one, which one would it be? Or, what is the main difference between them?
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-28-2005, 07:47 PM
jojobinks jojobinks is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: chicago
Posts: 770
Default Re: Book for NL. Better book than Harrington\'s for regular NL?

if you're new to nl, i recommend hoh.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-28-2005, 07:54 PM
maurile maurile is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Posts: 95
Default Re: Book for NL. Better book than Harrington\'s for regular NL?

If I could just get one I'd get Harrington's book because it is the most comprehensive of the three. Even though the focus is on tournaments, book 1 is on the early stages of a tournament when you really wouldn't play a particular hand any differently from how you'd play it in a ring game. The Harrington book gives specific advice on pre-flop play, and walks you through the thinking process of how to put people on hands and make proper decisions on each street.

Brunson's chapter is much more brief, but his advice is very good. Brunson gives you a particular approach to the game -- a very aggressive one that works for him -- while Harrington describes several different approaches (including a tight approach and an aggressive approach). Brunson gives some particular advice about how to play certain hands, and how to stay out of trouble with problem hands. But he doesn't walk you through numerous hand examples the way Harrington does.

The Ciaffone & Reuben book is more general in its advice, but is also very good. The strongest part of this book is in considering stack sizes -- describing how a certain bet from a smallish stack can mean something completely different from an identical bet from a bigger stack, etc. This book is also relatively brief compared to Harrington's, especially the parts that apply specifically to hold 'em.

In short, all three books are very good. But I'd go with Harrington's for its breadth & depth if I could just get one.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-28-2005, 11:45 PM
bweiser8311962 bweiser8311962 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 64
Default Re: Book for NL. Better book than Harrington\'s for regular NL?

I read SuperSystem over Christmas and was not impressed. Brunson's recommendation is great if you can burn through money ... It's basically win big, lose big to me.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-01-2005, 10:30 AM
Walter Pullis Walter Pullis is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 4
Default Re: Book for NL. Better book than Harrington\'s for regular NL?

No matter what book you get, if you are new to NL, play tournaments first! Otherwise you will lose your shirt.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-01-2005, 07:05 PM
MonkeeMan MonkeeMan is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin
Posts: 0
Default Re: Book for NL. Better book than Harrington\'s for regular NL?

[ QUOTE ]
In short, all three books are very good. But I'd go with Harrington's for its breadth & depth if I could just get one.

[/ QUOTE ]

Agree 100%.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.