Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Internet Gambling > Internet Gambling

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-22-2005, 12:34 PM
BillFranklin BillFranklin is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 20
Default Why aren\'t all sites as fast as UB?

Been wondering this for a while, seriously why aren't all the main sites using fast software like UB. In addition being great for Customer Satisfaction, it seems they would make more money by being able to have more hands per hour played thus a higher rake. thoughts?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-22-2005, 12:44 PM
slavic slavic is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: \"Let me make it nearly unanimous -- misplayed on every street.\"
Posts: 1,675
Default Re: Why aren\'t all sites as fast as UB?

Once you have something working for a main application, you don't tend to touch it that much to make improvements. Why? Well they are costly because of how late they come in the design process(i.e. after the whole thing is done and implemented) so the improvement has to be of great value or it just won't happen until enough requirements are put together to make a new version. Now why didn't this happen at Party were every added penny of rake is a huge gain? I have no idea.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-22-2005, 12:47 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Why aren\'t all sites as fast as UB?

Not sure. I just wish other sites had a miniview feature as an option. I'm surprised others don't have it. Took no time to get used to for me.

Maybe 2+2 shoudl come up with a poker room. 100% rake back for 2+2ers. All the built-in features we would want. The best ring games, the best tourney structures.

That would be awesome!

[img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-22-2005, 12:50 PM
4_2_it 4_2_it is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Mayor of Simpleton
Posts: 403
Default Re: Why aren\'t all sites as fast as UB?

[ QUOTE ]
Maybe 2+2 should come up with a poker room. 100% rake back for 2+2ers. All the built-in features we would want.

[/ QUOTE ]

Okay that sounds good.

[ QUOTE ]
The best ring games, the best tourney structures.


[/ QUOTE ]

Nope. Can you see why?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-22-2005, 01:01 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Why aren\'t all sites as fast as UB?

I don't know why, but when I play PS now it seems soooooo slow by comparison. At UB I can play just one table and get in 130+ hands an hour pretty easily (6-max). At PS I need to play 2 tables to do so.

Not a big deal really, 2 tables on a slower site is managable. Playing multiple 6-max tables at UB is pretty intense. Just 2 tables takes my full concentration at UB speed. At PS speed, I can still watch football and play 2 6-max tables.

Now...if UB just had more players [img]/images/graemlins/frown.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-22-2005, 01:27 PM
DarkKnight DarkKnight is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Posts: 265
Default Re: Why aren\'t all sites as fast as UB?

and if only the stupid UB windows would stop taking focus and making me type all kinds of crap
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-22-2005, 02:42 PM
sdc sdc is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 61
Default Re: Why aren\'t all sites as fast as UB?

agree UB is faster than most, however bodog is faster
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-22-2005, 08:03 PM
skaughty skaughty is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 37
Default Re: Why aren\'t all sites as fast as UB?

...because they have more traffic [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:12 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.