#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: my homework
[ QUOTE ]
I'm just saying it's a mistake to see "1 aggr" and immediately assume passive. Just like it's a mistake to see 3 and immediately assume aggro. [/ QUOTE ] Oh, I see the confusion. No, I definitely don't read an aggro rating of 1.4 as passive. I read it as reasonably aggro post-flop with a low degree of certainty. Combined with pre-flop numbers like 53/10 which tell us, with a high degree of certainty, that he's very loose and fairly passive (pre-flop and therefore, quite possibly, post-flop), and I think it's sketchy to characterize this player as "pretty aggressive". [ QUOTE ] The 20% number came from him playing 50% of his hands, and raising 10%. 20% of the hands he plays are for raises. [/ QUOTE ] Gotcha. /mc |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: my homework
[ QUOTE ]
not 3-betting the flop after a coldcall seems awfully lame. bottom two is a very vulnerable hand. [/ QUOTE ] Not to mention the fact you only flop 2 pair once every 49 flops and the BB has to have one of your cards to have a better two pair, or else a set. If you don't push your monsters in this situation, you aren't going to get any fold equity in the same situations with weaker holdings. |
|
|