Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #21  
Old 10-30-2005, 02:57 AM
Monty Cantsin Monty Cantsin is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 61
Default Re: my homework

[ QUOTE ]
I'm just saying it's a mistake to see "1 aggr" and immediately assume passive. Just like it's a mistake to see 3 and immediately assume aggro.

[/ QUOTE ]

Oh, I see the confusion. No, I definitely don't read an aggro rating of 1.4 as passive. I read it as reasonably aggro post-flop with a low degree of certainty.

Combined with pre-flop numbers like 53/10 which tell us, with a high degree of certainty, that he's very loose and fairly passive (pre-flop and therefore, quite possibly, post-flop), and I think it's sketchy to characterize this player as "pretty aggressive".


[ QUOTE ]

The 20% number came from him playing 50% of his hands, and raising 10%. 20% of the hands he plays are for raises.

[/ QUOTE ]

Gotcha.

/mc
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10-30-2005, 04:13 AM
TaintedRogue TaintedRogue is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 46
Default Re: my homework

[ QUOTE ]
not 3-betting the flop after a coldcall seems awfully lame. bottom two is a very vulnerable hand.

[/ QUOTE ]

Not to mention the fact you only flop 2 pair once every 49 flops and the BB has to have one of your cards to have a better two pair, or else a set. If you don't push your monsters in this situation, you aren't going to get any fold equity in the same situations with weaker holdings.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:42 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.