16 tabling without overlay / single display (low content)

cwes · #1 07-03-2005, 07:33 AM

Well, this won't help me, as 3 tabling at .05/.1 and two tabling at .25/.5 is the max I can handle without losing.

I read some discussion about adding a third 1600x1200 display for 8+ tabling. If you guys talking about that really make a lot of money from playing online poker, you might want to have a look at this little beauty:

16-tabling display

Of course it doesn't come cheap [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img] and unfortunately the manufacturer doesn't think it's well suited(!) for games...

So if somebody lays (or has already layed) his hands on this one, I'd really appreciate a screenshot of someone 16-tabling with a single display.

smoore · #2 07-03-2005, 08:26 AM

IMO, that's second nuts.

The pure nuts.

Dariel86 · #3 07-03-2005, 08:35 AM

Well exchange the sucky monitors with those highresolution monsters and you got Pure nuts^2

TStoneMBD · #4 07-03-2005, 10:52 AM

i agree with smoore. ive seen this monitor before and i dont think a multitabler would be able to use it for 16 tables. you wouldnt even be able to read the playerview stats for each player. id much rather have the panoramic view. its cooler and +ev in comparison to the 22" monitor imo.

astarck · #5 07-03-2005, 12:03 PM

Wow.

Impressive monitors. I like the celestial display using 548,982,417,689,332 monitors.

o0mr_bill0o · #6 07-03-2005, 01:06 PM

[ QUOTE ]
IMO, that's second nuts.

The pure nuts.

[/ QUOTE ]

sweet jesus

z80x86 · #7 07-03-2005, 01:20 PM

Holy [censored]! You can't really beat that. Cost benefit analysis though anyone?

PITTM · #8 07-03-2005, 01:43 PM

my work has about 10 of these in the office next to me. to date theyre the coolest monitors ive seen. Barco Isona

rj

pyroponic · #9 07-03-2005, 03:21 PM

Doesn't anyone realize that most very good poker players will eventually be 4-tabling middle limits if their games continue to evolve? Those monitors will go to waste one day...