|
|
|
|
#1
10-11-2005, 01:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: If Party had a lick of sense...
My guess is that 1800Gambler's point is that most Party players DO NOT have rake back and will not have it even after this current mess clears up.
So for Party to go ahead and just give EVERYONE rakeback, they would be costing themselves boat loads of money. Luke 
|
|
#2
10-11-2005, 01:20 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: If Party had a lick of sense...
And my point is that the fish lose the money back and it gets raked again, and again, and again. And like I said, if everybody is so opposed to the fish getting rakeback, then just set the minimum higher. This would be counterproductive, but then who am I to dispute all these college-boy experts?
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
