Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Books and Publications
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 08-22-2005, 12:08 PM
stipper30 stipper30 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 2
Default Re: Marcel \"Bluff\"

Ok, I'll bite

Marcel Luske

Mason Malmuth
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 08-22-2005, 12:29 PM
SNOWBALL138 SNOWBALL138 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: LA
Posts: 518
Default Re: Marcel \"Bluff\"

Mason doesn't play tournaments...
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 08-22-2005, 01:44 PM
Mason Malmuth Mason Malmuth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,831
Default Re: Marcel \"Bluff\"

Hi Snowball:

I do have some plans to change that in the future. Whether it actually happens depends on our publishing business.

Best wishes,
Mason
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 08-22-2005, 01:50 PM
Mason Malmuth Mason Malmuth is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Nevada
Posts: 1,831
Default My Comments

Hi Everyone:

Whether Marcel Luske is actually knowledgeable is something I don't know. This is really a criticism of the magazine.

First off, seven-card stud doesn't have blinds. It does have a bring-in, but that is different from a blind and affects the game in strategically different ways from a blind. (For one, a bring-in is a much smaller amount than a full bet like a blins is in hold 'em.)

Second, as some have already pointed out,the statement is contradictory. If the game structure is causing your opponents to "see the hand all the way through," then your bluffing/semi-bluffing should be reduced. We make this point in SCSFAP.

Best wishes,
Mason
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 08-23-2005, 06:23 AM
Leroy Soesman Leroy Soesman is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 87
Default Re: Marcel \"Bluff\"

To be quite honoust, I find it easier to believe that the magazine printed a wrong quote than that Luske made a mistake this stupid.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 08-23-2005, 10:04 AM
BarronVangorToth BarronVangorToth is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 7
Default Re: Marcel \"Bluff\"

I do not want to speak for Mason, but my impression of what he was implying wasn't that Marcel was wrong or not, but rather that the magazine printed something so ridiculous. Whether Marcel said it or not isn't really an issue - it's that the magazine would highlight such a quote in the first place. The main reason to have the quote IF they knew it to be false would be to mock Marcel, which is likewise not their intent, in my opinion.

While some may point to the occasional odd formatting error that occured with the 2+2 magazine in its earlier stages, across the board, the thinking perpetuated was proper and not erroneous as talking about blinds in 7-card Stud or providing incorrect bluffing strategy.

Barron Vangor Toth
BarronVangorToth.com
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:45 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.