Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-20-2005, 04:51 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default standard uncertainty

PR 3/6 4 Handed

Hero is Button with A [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]Q [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]

Preflop:
CO folds, Hero raises, SB 3-bets, BB folds, Hero caps, SB calls

Flop: 7 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] 2 [img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] J [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
SB bets, Hero calls

Turn: 6 [img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]
SB bets, Hero ??


SB is 36/25/1.5 over ~30 hands, and I get the impression that these numbers are going to increase over time. I think calling sucks, but do you like raise/folding and checking behind on the river UI, or just letting go? I tend to do one, although this time I did the other, but I've been in a slide so I'm questioning everything. I also think raising the flop is a reasonable move, yes?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-20-2005, 04:54 PM
jba jba is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 672
Default Re: standard uncertainty

i like just letting it go.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-20-2005, 05:00 PM
LoaferGee12 LoaferGee12 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Dreading my first downswing
Posts: 478
Default Re: standard uncertainty

[ QUOTE ]
i like just letting it go.

[/ QUOTE ]
Same.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-20-2005, 05:01 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: standard uncertainty

I raise flop here if you are planning on calling the turn.

If you are not, then call flop, fold turn UI.

True
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-20-2005, 05:16 PM
beachbum beachbum is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 9
Default Re: standard uncertainty

Raising the flop in this spot might get you 3-bet, which really sucks. However, getting 3-bet might define his hand a little better allowing you to more comfortably fold on the turn. But players like this really tend to get over aggro in 3 to 4-handed situations. Some players will bet/3-bet overs in this spot. Ideally here I'd raise the flop (not get 3-bet), check behind UI on the turn, and call any river. I'd really like to show this hand down as I'm ahead of a lot of Aces and other broadway combos with which he'd 3-bet preflop.

I don't know, raising the flop and keeping the initiative makes this hand a bit easier to play. But playing it the way you did the 3 options of folding the turn, calling down, and raising the turn for a "free showdown" have merit. Raising the turn gives you a bit more fold equity than raising the flop.

With all my indecisiveness here, I think I'm getting to showdown somehow.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-20-2005, 05:17 PM
jba jba is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 672
Default Re: standard uncertainty

[ QUOTE ]
Raising the flop in this spot might get you 3-bet, which really sucks. However, getting 3-bet might define his hand a little better allowing you to more comfortably fold on the turn. But players like this really tend to get over aggro in 3 to 4-handed situations. Some players will bet/3-bet overs in this spot. Ideally here I'd raise the flop (not get 3-bet), check behind UI on the turn, and call any river. I'd really like to show this hand down as I'm ahead of a lot of Aces and other broadway combos with which he'd 3-bet preflop.

I don't know, raising the flop and keeping the initiative makes this hand a bit easier to play. But playing it the way you did the 3 options of folding the turn, calling down, and raising the turn for a "free showdown" have merit. Raising the turn gives you a bit more fold equity than raising the flop.

With all my indecisiveness here, I think I'm getting to showdown somehow.

[/ QUOTE ]

IMO if we raise the flop after capping preflop it doesn't do much to define his hand because ours is so misrepresented
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-20-2005, 05:23 PM
Guruman Guruman is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 228
Default Re: standard uncertainty

--blind response--

My standard line here is to raise this flop, check through the turn, and call a river bet unimproved. That wins the most from other whiffed over hands, and gives me an escape route if I encounter undue aggression. If I get played back at I can release, and if I improve I can raise.

This is the kind of hand that can beat other UI overs without improving, and I want to show it down against a lag.

As played I think you have to drop.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-20-2005, 05:45 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: standard uncertainty

Results:
<font color="white">Hero usually raises, but folds this time. This feels weird, so he posts the hand on 2+2. </font>
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-20-2005, 06:03 PM
oxymoron oxymoron is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 66
Default Re: standard uncertainty

I feel that since you capped preflop calling the flop places a sticker on your forhead that says you have big overcards so he is going to continue to hammer you. Raise the flop.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.