#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 15/30 NL Holdem 3 hands for review
just curious if you are referring to the 5-5 PL game in nyc?
|
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 15/30 NL Holdem 3 hands for review
[ QUOTE ]
10G’s GOD DAMN!!!! MUST BE ONE HELL OF A PROFITABLE GAME! Never played with the lag before, but If I knew his play it would have factored into my bring more cash [/ QUOTE ] Yeah, it was very very profitable, but had huge huge variance. I mean, $10 G is usually a bankroll for that size of game. There are usually two LAG in the game, bordering maniac style play, add 2 or 3 loose passive gamblers who when get stuck chase too much, a few solid players and you've got a mix of the most crazy PL game ever. First time I played I only brought 3 g's, which unfortunately was the shortest stack on the table. Luckily I picked up AA vs. 22. vs. KK and of course the money went all-in before the flop I nearly tripled up so that brought me to par with most of the players allowing me to semi-bluff more often and playing a more better PL game with deep stacks. |
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 15/30 NL Holdem 3 hands for review
I've played in a few 5/5 Nl games in NYC (especially before I was 21), but I now perfer the AC card rooms.
|
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 15/30 NL Holdem 3 hands for review
since when is roughly 10 short buyins a bankroll for a 5/10 game?
|
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 15/30 NL Holdem 3 hands for review
Where did I say I had a short bankroll for a 5/10 game....????? I was playing in a 15/30 game Please reread post. Also 10 buyins is a little short for a bankroll Id recommend at least 20!
|
|
|