Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Gambling > Probability
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-06-2005, 03:55 PM
LockLow34 LockLow34 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 27
Default Pot odds for calling a river bet with 4 flush on board

Note: while this does involve a specific hand I was in, my question is of a more general nature.

your hand: J[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img] T[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]

board: T[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 3[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] 7[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]

Against a single opponent on the river what pot odds do you need to correctly call a bet from him?

My thinking (feel free to correct me) is that I know where 4 of the diamonds are, so of the 45 remaining unknown cards, 9 of them are diamonds. So it's 4-1 against him having a diamond in his hand. Therefore if the pot is laying me 5-1 a call is correct.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-06-2005, 04:11 PM
LetYouDown LetYouDown is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sharing a smoke w/negativity
Posts: 524
Default Re: Pot odds for calling a river bet with 4 flush on board

First of all, the size of the bet is incredibly important. Second of all, your opponent has two cards, not one.

You know 7 cards, 4 of which are diamonds. Therefore, there are C(45,2) combinations he can hold. C(36,2) is the number of hands that he can have that don't have a diamond. That comes out to about 36.4% that he has one, or 1.75 to 1. The problem here is that a diamond isn't the only thing that beats you. K-Q, any set, higher two pair.

This is opponent based to a large extent, but 99 times out of 100, I'm folding in that spot to any reasonable bet.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-06-2005, 04:57 PM
AaronBrown AaronBrown is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 505
Default Re: Pot odds for calling a river bet with 4 flush on board

In addition to LetYouDown's excellent reply, I'd add that you have important clues from the betting. He stayed in the first round, then stayed in for a flop that probably didn't help him. Okay, he could have had two diamonds or an 8 9 (either of which will beat you); but more likely he held two high cards, or an Ace and another card that paired on the board, or a pair or suited high cards or connectors. His betting pattern should tell you a lot about the relative probabilities.

Think of all those hands that beat you: KQ, A with J, 10, 3 or 7; JJ, 10 10 (okay, both of those are unlikely), 7 7, 3 3, any hand with a diamond. About the only likely hands that don't beat you are A K, A Q and K J, and none of these are likely to be bet on the river as this hand was.

I would need a good reason to stay in this pot, extraordinary pot odds or a strong indication that he's betting on a pair of Aces and nothing else. It's hard to see any hand you could beat, other than a pure bluff.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-06-2005, 06:26 PM
uuDevil uuDevil is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Remembering P. Tillman
Posts: 246
Default Re: Pot odds for calling a river bet with 4 flush on board

[ QUOTE ]
Against a single opponent on the river what pot odds do you need to correctly call a bet from him?

[/ QUOTE ]

If you were first to act, maybe you should have bet. (Do a search for "Clarkmeister Theorem" or see this thread for example.) If you checked, you may have induced a bluff, so it depends on how your opponent plays. If he [edit] ALWAYS [/edit] bets, then LetYouDown is right and you need pot odds of > 1.75:1.

LetYouDown said:

[ QUOTE ]

This is opponent based to a large extent, but 99 times out of 100, I'm folding in that spot to any reasonable bet.

[/ QUOTE ]

However, I'm not so sure about this. Against a player who may bluff or bet a hand I can beat, I'm calling most of the time. To get a number requires solving an EV equation:

P(my hand is best)*Potsize+(1-P(my hand is best))*(-amt of bet I must call)=0

So I have to estimate P(my hand is best) in order to solve for Potsize. If I think my opponent will bet 20% of the time without a diamond and MHIG that same percentage, P(my hand is best)=.2 and I must call 1 BB, then Potsize= 4 BB. To fold very often in a bigger pot, you have to be VERY sure of your opponent, and I don't think you can be that sure of most poker player's tendencies.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-06-2005, 07:25 PM
LetYouDown LetYouDown is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Sharing a smoke w/negativity
Posts: 524
Default Re: Pot odds for calling a river bet with 4 flush on board

I'll admit that 99/100 was a bit of a stretch. If you're up against a complete LAG or know your opponent reasonably well and think he's very capable of a bluff there, it might be worth calling. I was just saying that the only hands you really beat are complete bluffs...and as likely as that board is to be bluffed at, he could be bluffing with the better hand.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-06-2005, 08:31 PM
shutupndeal shutupndeal is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 31
Default Re: Pot odds for calling a river bet with 4 flush on board

I agree with almost everythin said here but the main thing in my play is to keep it up fron that its all one big game which means that yes given the correct pot odds I am calling, I may not like it but Im going to do it, without them Im gonna cry and moan about my rotten luck and how the world hates me and then click fold with my usual deftness!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:41 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.