Do u win moore with AKs than AKo?

[4_2_it]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
They are basically the same hand. You aren't getting paid off with your flush because you need Qxs to call your pre-flop bet and hit the flush. How often is that going to happen?

[/ QUOTE ]

But people love to call PF raises with suited connectors, suited 1-gappers and many love any 2 suited. At the nl25-50, a flush is a flush to them.

[/ QUOTE ]

True, but do you stack people often enough with flush over flushes to warrant calling turn bets with implied odds? I really have no idea. I think Axs works a lot better because many villains will play Kxs and pay you off.

[WhiteWolf]

[ QUOTE ]
They are basically the same hand. You aren't getting paid off with your flush because you need Qxs to call your pre-flop bet and hit the flush. How often is that going to happen?

[/ QUOTE ]

I don't think the major strength of AKs comes from actually hitting flushes (although it helps). I think it picks up a lot of strength because having TPTK with a flush or back-door flush possiblity puts you in situations where you can play your hand more aggresively to pick up pots, but not lose as much value when you are called.

[tripp0807]

[ QUOTE ]
Flush draws and runner runner flush draws bail me out all the time... there is no way that AKo=AKs.

[/ QUOTE ]

No way 24-1 against bails you out all the time. Period.

[grouchie]

with this database, small as it is.
aks 2.78 bb/hand 29 times
ako 2.69 bb/hand 99 times