Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Poker Theory
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-17-2005, 04:32 AM
Siegmund Siegmund is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 415
Default Seeing the flop for one bet.

A proposition:

"On all hands where the pot is unraised before the flop, at least one of the limpers/checkers has made a mistake."

True or false, in your opinion?

You may interpret the word "mistake" however you'd like (general usage, FTOP sense, or whatever else the word means to you) but if you feel your answer might be different if you used a different defintion, please give me a clue how you meant it.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-17-2005, 05:16 AM
Toddster18 Toddster18 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 29
Default Re: Seeing the flop for one bet.

[ QUOTE ]
A proposition:

"On all hands where the pot is unraised before the flop, at least one of the limpers/checkers has made a mistake."

True or false, in your opinion?

You may interpret the word "mistake" however you'd like (general usage, FTOP sense, or whatever else the word means to you) but if you feel your answer might be different if you used a different defintion, please give me a clue how you meant it.

[/ QUOTE ]

Equity wise, yes. Unless there is a pot where only two players are involved and they somehow are exactly 50/50 on equity, the player who has the most equity "should" have raised.

Alternatively, this is not always correct. Perhaps its folded to a player on the button with AA who knows the uberlag in the SB will go nuts without a hand against a button limper but that both blinds will fold to a raise. In this situation it's probably correct to simply call.

So, I say... as is (most) always the case... "it depends". [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img].

-Todd
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-17-2005, 08:16 AM
AaronBrown AaronBrown is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: New York
Posts: 505
Default Re: Seeing the flop for one bet.

I think it's theoretically possible that no one made a mistake. The first player to check obviously could have a checking hand. One check makes the next player more likely to raise or fold, because he knows he's playing against a checking hand. But there are still hands too speculative to raise, but too good to fold.

Each subsequent player needs an even more perfect checking hand. If I think I'm playing against several guys with suited connectors, I'll raise on any high cards or pair, and fold almost any flush or straight possibility. But if I have suited J 10, I can't raise except as a pure bluff, but I like my chances with a good flop.

If the first guy to check could do it again, knowing that he was checked, he would probably raise or fold. But based on what he knew at the time, he could have done the right thing.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:57 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.