|
|
#51
11-10-2005, 11:46 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: KKF vs Mahatma (aka Arbitrary)
[ QUOTE ]
KKF: Doyle Brunson says the key to no-limit is to put a man to a decision for all his chips. Mahatma's just done that. He's representing two aces, the only thing better than my cowboys. I can only fold, if I believe him... [/ QUOTE ] Step 1 is to raise to 1000 with 5/10 blinds with 10k behind the first hand with KK. 
|
|
#52
11-11-2005, 02:47 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KKF vs Mahatma (aka Arbitrary)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Wow, hows this for the table from hell. Mahatmah, Bruiser, KKF and now captnzeebo sits down. Looks like the unknown is in for a world of hurt. [/ QUOTE ]I was just sitting in to shout stupid insults at SwiftRaise who apparently is a 2+2r...whoever he is should be banned from the forums for being so stupid. [/ QUOTE ] SwiftRaise isn't a 2+2er.
|
|
#53
11-11-2005, 02:56 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KKF vs Mahatma (aka Arbitrary)
[ QUOTE ]
KKF vs Mahatma (aka Arbitrary) [/ QUOTE ] what's the story with mahatma being arbitrary or not? i thought you concluded arb was NOT prahlad, and the ppl who said he was (diablo, matusow) also retracted those claims?
|
|
#54
11-11-2005, 03:05 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KKF vs Mahatma (aka Arbitrary)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] KKF vs Mahatma (aka Arbitrary) [/ QUOTE ] what's the story with mahatma being arbitrary or not? i thought you concluded arb was NOT prahlad, and the ppl who said he was (diablo, matusow) also retracted those claims? [/ QUOTE ] For the record, I never said he was.
|
|
#55
11-11-2005, 03:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KKF vs Mahatma (aka Arbitrary)
FWIW I was in the process of doing a short stack hit and run on the UB 50/100 a few hours ago when Mahatma was talking with the other big stack and he typed that he'd just switched back to this account after running bad on another recently. No idea if Prahlad is Arbitrary or not but that comment did seem to suggest it to some degree.
|
|
#56
11-11-2005, 03:22 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KKF vs Mahatma (aka Arbitrary)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] KKF vs Mahatma (aka Arbitrary) [/ QUOTE ] what's the story with mahatma being arbitrary or not? i thought you concluded arb was NOT prahlad, and the ppl who said he was (diablo, matusow) also retracted those claims? [/ QUOTE ] For the record, I never said he was. [/ QUOTE ] ok. i'm only going by what kane said.
|
|
#57
11-11-2005, 03:50 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KKF vs Mahatma (aka Arbitrary)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] KKF vs Mahatma (aka Arbitrary) [/ QUOTE ] what's the story with mahatma being arbitrary or not? i thought you concluded arb was NOT prahlad, and the ppl who said he was (diablo, matusow) also retracted those claims? [/ QUOTE ] For the record, I never said he was. [/ QUOTE ] ok. i'm only going by what kane said. [/ QUOTE ] You cannot trust a word out of that KKF kid's mouth.
|
|
#58
11-11-2005, 05:09 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KKF vs Mahatma (aka Arbitrary)
I saw him do this yesterday, but he came back as "APLUSGAME247"
|
|
#59
11-11-2005, 05:21 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KKF vs Mahatma (aka Arbitrary)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] KKF vs Mahatma (aka Arbitrary) [/ QUOTE ] what's the story with mahatma being arbitrary or not? i thought you concluded arb was NOT prahlad, and the ppl who said he was (diablo, matusow) also retracted those claims? [/ QUOTE ] I think that the Arbritrary account is used by multiple players. Right now, I am 99.9% sure that Praland is one of those players.
|
|
#60
11-11-2005, 06:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: KKF vs Mahatma (aka Arbitrary)
Other then having multiple styles of play and making it a little more challenging for opponents to play against you, what are the benefits of having multiple users share an account?
I'll assume prahlad has a suffecient enough bankroll not to need other users for the 50/100 game, but I could be wrong.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
