|
|
#1
09-30-2005, 02:01 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Whoring
Why do people prefer to play Limit rather to NL when Bonus Whoring?
|
|
#2
09-30-2005, 03:30 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Whoring
I'm not sure if there's a difference in rake structure, but it may just so happen to be that most people are more comfortable with their limit game. I know I personally reserve NL play for tourneys. I'm sure other people have different responses for this though.
- thing85 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]
|
|
#3
09-30-2005, 09:13 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Whoring
[ QUOTE ]
Why do people prefer to play Limit rather to NL when Bonus Whoring? [/ QUOTE ] 1. I am better at limit 2. I can usually play more hands/hr at limit Acme
|
|
#4
09-30-2005, 09:19 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Whoring
Definately the number of hands is a factor. Limit people can do 8 tables plus, whereas NL 4 is pretty tough.
|
|
#5
09-30-2005, 02:18 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Whoring
1. Less Variance
2. Easier to Multi-table.
|
|
#7
09-30-2005, 03:28 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Whoring
It depends on the requirements for clearing the bonus.
If it is ANY raked hand, then I prefer NL, because even a .05 raked hand at NL25 will count. If it is raked hands > 0.50, then limit is better, because in NL only the pots that are more than $10 will count.
|
|
#9
09-30-2005, 05:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Whoring
[ QUOTE ]
1. Less Variance [/ QUOTE ] Statistically, NL has less variance than limit. Acme
|
|
#10
09-30-2005, 05:47 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Whoring
I used to play NL and did not do so well. I found that I could go all in with a really good starting hand like AA or KK and then lose to someone that caught a flush or straight. It was too easy to lose $25.00 on one hand. I prefer limit because I still make mistakes but they are usually not as costly.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
