$11: Routine folding of trips?

[bones]

[ QUOTE ]
Re: $11: Routine folding of trips?

[/ QUOTE ]

At the risk of being labelled nittish, you have a set, not trips. While both are 3 of a kind, they are very different in terms of relative hand strength.

Sorry, just a pet peeve.

[Pudge714]

[ QUOTE ]
Routine fold? Yikes, you are getting over 8 to 1 to call here. You have 10 outs to the nuts. Do the math.

[/ QUOTE ]

[lem45216]

Haha sorry, i couldn't remember which was which when i wrote the thing so i took a stab in the dark.

And to everyone else: i now do realise it was a horrible fold and really should have done the maths. But thanks for the harsh words of advice, they have alerted me to this big leak.

-jaffa-

[schwza]

[ QUOTE ]
Haha sorry, i couldn't remember which was which when i wrote the thing so i took a stab in the dark.

And to everyone else: i now do realise it was a horrible fold and really should have done the maths. But thanks for the harsh words of advice, they have alerted me to this big leak.

-jaffa-

[/ QUOTE ]

not totally horrible. if you had been closing the action, then it'd be horrible. if you thought for some reason the other dude would reraise a high % of the time, then folding would be right.

but yeah, you should've called. there's also some chance that you're going to win the pot unimproved, or will split when a Q makes a straight on board.