($33) -ROI help continued: Too many 4ths?

205 is what I have to work with. I understand sample size and the dangers of extrapolating too much information with a small sample. That said, I feel that it's completely asinine to ignore the data you DO have until you have spent the $33k in tourney buyins to get a 1000sng sample size, which, btw, is still too small.

205 is small but not worthless.

FWIW, this is my distribution for my $22s

1st 148 14.3%
2nd 107 10.3%
3rd 102 9.8%
4th 126 12.2%
5th 121 11.7%
6th 135 13.0%
7th 105 10.1%
8th 79 7.6%
9th 74 7.1%
10th 40 3.9%
Total 1037 100.0%

[Mr_J]

[ QUOTE ]
I feel that it's completely asinine to ignore the data you DO have until you have spent the $33k in tourney buyins to get a 1000sng sample size

[/ QUOTE ]

You are using your data the wrong way. 205 is worthless for placing distributions, but it's great for analyzing how well you are playing. So either get someone to look over your HHs or post some up. Distribution stats won't help.

I'm already doing both, just throwing the numbers up there in case they mean anything -- thanks for explaining that I shouldn't waste any more time thinking about them.

I don't limp here. I raise just enought to put shortie all in. I doubt I call a reraise, but he wouldn't have have even entered the hand if you'd raised.

Nor do I push when the Q comes. A very Laggy player checking behind on the flop just screams "Trap".