Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Politics
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #23  
Old 09-06-2005, 01:12 PM
elwoodblues elwoodblues is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Rosemount, MN
Posts: 462
Default Re: Scalia On Judges Judging Morals

That comment was in the context of the original Roe decision, not the subsequent body of federal abortion case law.

[ QUOTE ]
legislator basically decided that a fetus in that stage of developement was worth protecting, and the court struck it down.

[/ QUOTE ]

They did not define it as a life (i.e. being entitled to all of the same rights as you or I.) If they did, the outcome (in my opinion) would have to be different because abortion law right now is basically a balancing of rights. In the balance is the right of privacy/autonomy on the one hand and the state's interest in protecting the fetus. By legislatively elevating a fetus to the status of a "life" the balance changes significantly. So significantly, in my opinion, that abortion jurisprudence would be fundamentally changed with the stroke of a pen.
Reply With Quote
 


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:20 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.