#21
|
|||
|
|||
Re: you are right
[ QUOTE ]
You are absolutely right. Once you have the A [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], for the next game it's exactly 1 in 52. Only if you want to know the probability of getting it two times in a row, without knowing what will happen the first time, than you have to calculate 52 x 52 = 2704. All speculations about so-called "emperical probabilities" are nothing but wishful thinking, otherwise all casinos would have already gone bancrupt! [/ QUOTE ] Whoops, you are right. I added them instead of multiplying (52+52=104 whereas 52x52=2704) Thus 1/2704=.0003, which means you'd have to take a card from the deck and reshuffle after each time 3 million times before you'd pull out one twice in a row. [img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img] |
#22
|
|||
|
|||
Re: you are right
Almost there. What are the odds? Not the probability [percent of times it will happen] – what are the odds?
|
#23
|
|||
|
|||
Re: you are right
[ QUOTE ]
Almost there. What are the odds? Not the probability [percent of times it will happen] – what are the odds? [/ QUOTE ] what are the odds that no matter what anyone responds there'll be someone who doesn't agree? hmmm.... |
#24
|
|||
|
|||
Re: you are right
[ QUOTE ]
Almost there. What are the odds? Not the probability [percent of times it will happen] – what are the odds? [/ QUOTE ] Oh, well 1 outta 3 million. I don't see what the difference is though, I just worded it differently. |
#25
|
|||
|
|||
Re: you are right
It’s not 3,000,000 to 1 ... not even close ... that is why the terminology is important in understanding the concept.
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
Re: you are right
im an idiot, but im going with 2703 to 1. (the 2703 based on the other persons math work, im not going to check it)
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: you are right
[ QUOTE ]
It’s not 3,000,000 to 1 ... not even close ... that is why the terminology is important in understanding the concept. [/ QUOTE ] How is it not? I think you're misunderstanding. The words proability and odds are interchangable, at least for this situation. "The odds of pulling the same card from the deck twice in a row is three million to one" means the same as "The proability of pulling the same card from the deck twice in a row is three million to one." Or, like I already said, you'd have to pull out a card three million times before you pulled the same card out twice in a row. |
#28
|
|||
|
|||
Re: once the cards are shuffled, arent the odds just the same
[ QUOTE ]
if i shuffle the deck, and take the top card, say its A [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], the odds of that happening are 1 in 52.. i shuffle again, the odds of getting the A [img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] are again 1 in 52, am i correct in this thinking? [/ QUOTE ] The probability that you get the Ace spades is 1 in 52, or 1.92% The odds that you get the Ace spades is 1 to 51 against. These are different. |
#29
|
|||
|
|||
Re: you are right
So regarding our question:
The odds are 2703 to 1 against. (52*52)-1 The probability (or chance) it will happen is 0.000369822 or 0.0369822%. (1/(52*52)) These both mean the same thing but stating it as odds appears to make the answer clearer in this case. |
#30
|
|||
|
|||
Re: once the cards are shuffled, arent the odds just the same
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] absolutely correct [/ QUOTE ] [/ QUOTE ] thread should have ended here |
|
|