#91
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 10 Table NL 2000 on Party to reduce variance
No. The variance of your estimate of your win rate decreases. Your bankroll variance increases. Your win rate variance stays the same.
|
#92
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 10 Table NL 2000 on Party to reduce variance
[ QUOTE ]
This is because every hand is reflection of your ability (i.e. win-rate) [/ QUOTE ] Is it really? It would be nice to think so but there is no reason to believe it is. Thinking about what just one hand could contain could show why this is wrong. And why thinking of win rates = skill, which is hugely prevalent on 2+2 is also very wrong. gl dd |
#93
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 10 Table NL 2000 on Party to reduce variance
this thread is very depressing, can we let it die please?
|
#94
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 10 Table NL 2000 on Party to reduce variance
[ QUOTE ]
No. The variance of your estimate of your win rate decreases. Your bankroll variance increases. Your win rate variance stays the same. [/ QUOTE ] thank you |
#95
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 10 Table NL 2000 on Party to reduce variance
am i missing something? i'm pretty sure i know who phallusy is. he is a "big" name on pokerstars.
|
#96
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 10 Table NL 2000 on Party to reduce variance
Robespierre is an [censored].
-Jason |
|
|