Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 10-22-2005, 01:10 AM
JKratzer JKratzer is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Iowa
Posts: 65
Default Re: Live $2/$5 Non-Standard Set Line

I like the flop check. Too bad he checked behind, but that's an acceptable risk I think. On the turn I only like your check if you very sure he's going to bet (i.e. when he moves for chips he's not faking.) I guess the allin is okay, but I don't think a decent villian is calling with AK, unless its AK [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]. Here I think I'd call the turn and move in on the river, as long as no diamond hits it'll look like a missed draw and get more action (maybe?). Overall, well played.

JKratzer
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 10-22-2005, 02:25 AM
Big_Jim Big_Jim is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 89
Default RESULTS

Villian goes into the tank, staring me down.

I stand statueque for about a minute, during which villian is agonizing. He starts muttering to himself, and I lean back in my chair, confident.

He looks at me and says "You've gotta be on a bluff."
I wink at him.

He calls, drawing dead, with A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]K[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img].
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10-22-2005, 02:31 AM
Big_Jim Big_Jim is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 89
Default Re: Live $2/$5 Non-Standard Set Line

[ QUOTE ]
What kind of a raise was the big one you pulled on him before? Was it an AI raise?

[/ QUOTE ]
Yup.

[ QUOTE ]
I prefer a standard raise here, but I do understand your reasoning, as a standard raise might look too strong.

[/ QUOTE ]
I considered a standard raise, but thought that I could get more value from the all-in. Villian can convince himself I'm on a semi-bluff or convince himself that he has outs on the turn... not on the river.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10-22-2005, 02:37 AM
Big_Jim Big_Jim is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 89
Default Re: Live $2/$5 Non-Standard Set Line

[ QUOTE ]
Nice fleshed-out thought process.

How would villain react to you leading into his made hand on the turn? I think there is a fair chance that you will get raised, and be able to get more in there.

[/ QUOTE ]

I think that it is fairly likely that villian will put me on a weakish hand if I bet into him. And will likely raise... again I'm more concerned here about picking up the donk limpers. I'm not sure if I'm overvaluing having them in the pot... but I still think that it is VERY likely that they would come along for a bet, but not for a bet and a raise. Perhaps this thinking is flawed.

I thought that if only one comes along, he still might be able to put me on a move, and if two or more come along, then he'll likely be able to fold... but I make up the money from the donks, anyway.

Let me again stress how unusual it was for none of the limpers to get involved after the flop.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10-22-2005, 02:46 AM
Big_Jim Big_Jim is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 89
Default Re: Live $2/$5 Non-Standard Set Line

[ QUOTE ]
On the turn I only like your check if you very sure he's going to bet

[/ QUOTE ]

I was probably 80% confident in this read. He would sit up real straight and look around the table a lot when he was ready to bet.

[ QUOTE ]
I guess the allin is okay, but I don't think a decent villian is calling with AK, unless its A[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]K[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] .

[/ QUOTE ]

Really? You don't think this looks like a bluff? I doubt villian thought that I had that good a line on his play, and he also probably thinks that I view him as weak-tight. This might not have been well explained in OP.

[ QUOTE ]
Here I think I'd call the turn and move in on the river, as long as no diamond hits it'll look like a missed draw and get more action (maybe?).

[/ QUOTE ]
Hmm.. interesting. It's probably pretty close, but I think the turn raise is just about as convincing as the river bet, except that I don't have to worry about a scare card chasing him out, and lets him call if he has a draw.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 10-22-2005, 02:59 AM
flawless_victory flawless_victory is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 144
Default Re: Live $2/$5 Non-Standard Set Line

first, i dont think this is "non-standard"... this is the most standard hand in the history of the 2+2 forums...
next, i dont think this looks a bluff... it looks like a hand that beats AK and AK has the easiest laydown here, however, i think a live 2/5 player will fold AK here almost never. like .03%.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 10-22-2005, 03:04 AM
Big_Jim Big_Jim is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 89
Default Re: Live $2/$5 Non-Standard Set Line

Really? This is standard? I thought that everybody and their mother would say lead the flop, lead the turn if you didn't lead the flop.

[ QUOTE ]
it looks like a hand that beats AK and AK has the easiest laydown here

[/ QUOTE ]
Without the specific pre-flop and turn reads (which I was assuming opponent didn't know I had) what hands check this flop twice that beat AK? Especially from a player known to fast play big hands?
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 10-22-2005, 03:14 AM
flawless_victory flawless_victory is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 144
Default Re: Live $2/$5 Non-Standard Set Line

[ QUOTE ]
Really? This is standard? I thought that everybody and their mother would say lead the flop, lead the turn if you didn't lead the flop.

[/ QUOTE ]
leading either would be truly stupid... like folding KK UTG stupid... just ridiculous.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
it looks like a hand that beats AK and AK has the easiest laydown here

[/ QUOTE ]
Without the specific pre-flop and turn reads (which I was assuming opponent didn't know I had) what hands check this flop twice that beat AK? Especially from a player known to fast play big hands?

[/ QUOTE ]all of them.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 10-22-2005, 03:37 AM
chuddo chuddo is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 20
Default Re: Live $2/$5 Non-Standard Set Line

jim, i think this hand would have been better served with the ol' "role-reversal" style post.

i think if i am villain i can bet 200 here on the turn and safely dump it to a push someone that covers me, as it is an easily sniffed-out set, or Axs that turned Aces up.

if i have the AK and didn't continue on this flop, and I turn an A, I will be betting definitely, but folding to your turn move.

but as flawless stated, most live 2/5 players are not capable of folding this, unless they are the inherently super-tight.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 10-22-2005, 03:50 AM
Big_Jim Big_Jim is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 89
Default Re: Live $2/$5 Non-Standard Set Line

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Really? This is standard? I thought that everybody and their mother would say lead the flop, lead the turn if you didn't lead the flop.

[/ QUOTE ]
leading either would be truly stupid... like folding KK UTG stupid... just ridiculous.

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
it looks like a hand that beats AK and AK has the easiest laydown here

[/ QUOTE ]
Without the specific pre-flop and turn reads (which I was assuming opponent didn't know I had) what hands check this flop twice that beat AK? Especially from a player known to fast play big hands?

[/ QUOTE ]all of them.

[/ QUOTE ]

I find this rather surprising.

You take this line against an unknown?

Keep in mind there are 4 people to act before I do.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.