|
|
#21
10-10-2005, 03:49 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Which Site is now the Best?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Who voted for Paradise? [/ QUOTE ] LOL...Who voted for Party? After all these years I can't figure out why it's so popular. What am I missing? [/ QUOTE ] Ummm.... players will to give up their $2000 a week pay check on a regular basis? 
|
|
#23
10-10-2005, 04:26 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which Site is now the Best?
I think it's Stars, hands down.
I play the 6-max tables, which I think are as good as any out there. The tournament structure is slower, which favors better players, and the the turbo SNGs are incredibly beatable for those looking for a faster format, although I've only played up to $55+$5. I haven't found better software and the support is top notch. Although the bonuses could be more frequent, all of my bankroll is usually on the site, so it doesn't matter much to me. When I do the occassional whoring trip, I'm always thankful to come back home.
|
|
#24
10-10-2005, 12:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which Site is now the Best?
[ QUOTE ]
I think this poll is going to show where people are currently playing at as opposed to which site is the best. I've only tried Eurobet, Party, and Pokerstars. I voted for Party, but I have no idea how it compares to the rest of those sites. [/ QUOTE ] Then you are the culprit of what you are arguing. I have played at every single site, and I think many others have too.
|
|
#25
10-10-2005, 01:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which Site is now the Best?
Game selection - Party
Abundance of bad players - Party Variety (limits and games) - Party Tournaments - Party/Stars UI - Stars Support - Stars SNG's - Stars Tougher games - Stars My last Empire cashout finally hit. I'm outta there. Bulk of my online BR is going to PP, with a smaller amout going to Stars for SNG's, the 2p2 games, and tourneys. Empire was great while it lasted. Time to move on.
|
|
#26
10-10-2005, 01:25 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which Site is now the Best?
[ QUOTE ]
Game selection - Party Abundance of bad players - Party Variety (limits and games) - Party Tournaments - Party/Stars UI - Stars Support - Stars SNG's - Stars Tougher games - Stars [/ QUOTE ] agree.. but once(if) stars gets rakeback, it's game over.
|
|
#27
10-10-2005, 01:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which Site is now the Best?
Try Absolute Poker
|
|
#29
10-10-2005, 02:07 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which Site is now the Best?
[ QUOTE ]
Pokerstars is crap for me. I play omaha hi/low and stars has some 1/2 games going but 2/4 has nothing, 3/6 has nothing and finally 5/10 has nothing. You have to jump to 10/20 to see a full ring going. [censored]'em I don't have the cash to play 10/20. What a joke. Party is the site to play at. At least they have some medium stakes games running. WOW I jeck checked stars and they have NO 10/20 game running, its the 15/30 that is the next step. A 1/2 player has to jump to 15/30 to see a game, riiiight!!! [/ QUOTE ] Do you ever try sitting down and starting a game yourself? Sometimes all it takes is a couple players before others start joining in.
|
|
#30
10-10-2005, 03:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Which Site is now the Best?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Game selection - Party Abundance of bad players - Party Variety (limits and games) - Party Tournaments - Party/Stars UI - Stars Support - Stars SNG's - Stars Tougher games - Stars [/ QUOTE ] agree.. but once(if) stars gets rakeback, it's game over. [/ QUOTE ] If I ever see a HE ring game on Stars have greater than an 8 BB average pot size, I'll throw a party. I'd love to be able to play on their software regularly, but every time I check the $2-4 games, the biggest pots are $24, maybe $25. Stars is by far the best for tournaments, but for ring games it stinks. Rakeback isn't going to make up for lack of juicy games.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
