Suggestions on where to go now

[Armand_Tamzarian]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
go to the prima network.. software isnt slow must be your pc cause prima runs faster than any other poker room does i think. Games are juicy [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Do you know if you can have more than one account with them? I signed up with Royal Vegas a long time ago, but I don't know if it isn't kosher to now sign up with Gaming Club to get rakeback.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes you can have accounts with all the prima skins if you want but you have to register with the same alias you had before. email ActivationCode@Primapoker.com for an alias verification code

[jmgurgeh]

[ QUOTE ]
Pokerroom is the suckiest suck site that ever sucked my friend. Pokerroom? Oh good lord no.....

And you said that the Crypto sites were nearly as soft as Party? Ummmmmmm....that is not correct.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is why it's so hard to decide what sites are actually loose and to what degree. If you go to a site like http://www.pokertop100.com/ it rates InterPoker's looseness of games at 80/100, same as for Party (I think only Pacific is higher). But ratings from this site don't really jive with the BW grading of the different sites/games, and I don't know how much stock I'd put into those anyway.

Thanks for the input though.

[rhizome]

[ QUOTE ]

Cryptologic (Inter Poker, Caribbean Sun, etc.)
30% rakeback, games nearly as soft as Party's, good reload bonuses, mediocre software.


[/ QUOTE ]

Huh? Maybe I have bad table selection, but I played my monthly 300 hands at poker plex yesterday while party was down and the average vpip on each my 4 tables of 1/2 limit were all under 20%. The low limit games are no where near as soft as party.

[Overdrive]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Pokerroom is the suckiest suck site that ever sucked my friend. Pokerroom? Oh good lord no.....

And you said that the Crypto sites were nearly as soft as Party? Ummmmmmm....that is not correct.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is why it's so hard to decide what sites are actually loose and to what degree. If you go to a site like http://www.pokertop100.com/ it rates InterPoker's looseness of games at 80/100, same as for Party (I think only Pacific is higher). But ratings from this site don't really jive with the BW grading of the different sites/games, and I don't know how much stock I'd put into those anyway.

Thanks for the input though.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, back in the day Interpoker was loose - before they were overrun by bonus whores. Things are always changing in the world of online poker. For instance Paradise used to be the #1 site and was also notorious for tight agressive pros - but most of them moved away to Party and other places and now Paradise is tied to a sportsbook and can have some wild eyed games rockin' at times. Don't depend on some websites "reviews" of the different poker sites, just play there a while and see if you like it. For instance you may like Pokeroom, some people do, and lots of others think it is very, very, bad (They recently raised their rake through the roof for instance) just play where you like to play, not where some "review site" says has good games.

[Guthrie]

[ QUOTE ]
Paradise seems to have a good interface but aren't the games super tight?

[/ QUOTE ]
Exactly the opposite in my experience. The games are very soft but the software is horrible, the games incredibly slow, and managing the hand histories requires a full-time personal assistant.

[goodguy_1]

[ QUOTE ]
Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Paradise seems to have a good interface but aren't the games super tight?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Exactly the opposite in my experience. The games are very soft but the software is horrible, the games incredibly slow, and managing the hand histories requires a full-time personal assistant.

[/ QUOTE ]

hahah so true [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Quote:
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Paradise seems to have a good interface but aren't the games super tight?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------


Exactly the opposite in my experience. The games are very soft but the software is horrible, the games incredibly slow, and managing the hand histories requires a full-time personal assistant.

[/ QUOTE ]

hahah so true [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

The .50/1 games I've played on Paradise have been incredibly soft. There were times when it almost seemed softer than PP (though I doubt this is true overall).

- thing85 [img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img]

[jmgurgeh]

I don't know why there would be so much disagreement about Poker Room. Generally, either the software sucks or it doesn't (same with support, same with softness of games). I guess I'll check out their new rake schedule. Unfortunately I just discovered that they don't let you view the games without creating an account. Jerks.