|
|
#1
08-29-2005, 08:53 PM
|
|||
|
|||
who do we have to kill?
to get mr sklansky to comment on a hand or two around here?
is he contractually obligated to post in the philosophy forum as much as possible? 
|
|
#4
08-29-2005, 09:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: who do we have to kill?
[ QUOTE ]
This could all be solved very simply. All it would take would be for the posters on this forum to a acknowledge and state, "David I now realize that the existence of any kind of personal God is highly unlikely. And if he does exist, he is most likely you". That should happen soon enough and we can all get back to holdem strategy. [/ QUOTE ] -David Sklansky link
|
|
#5
08-29-2005, 09:13 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: who do we have to kill?
</font><blockquote><font class="small">En respuesta a:</font><hr />
</font><blockquote><font class="small">En respuesta a:</font><hr /> This could all be solved very simply. All it would take would be for the posters on this forum to a acknowledge and state, "David I now realize that the existence of any kind of personal God is highly unlikely. And if he does exist, he is most likely you". That should happen soon enough and we can all get back to holdem strategy. [/ QUOTE ] -David Sklansky link [/ QUOTE ] Easily the funniest thing I've ever read
|
|
#6
08-30-2005, 11:27 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: who do we have to kill?
He's going through his midlife crisis. Instead of driving a corvette and wearing gold chains and speedos, he has chosen to post absurd thoughts that have no bearing on real life.
When he is finished, he will resume posting on poker. Be patient. The fact that he is posting about necrophelia demonstrates that he is at the bottom of his deep seated Freudian issues and should be back on course for poker soon.
|
|
#7
08-30-2005, 11:28 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: who do we have to kill?
Bleg.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
