|
|
|||||||
| View Poll Results: Assuming the BB is loose, would you push? | |||
| Yes |
   
|
15 | 68.18% |
| No |
  
|
7 | 31.82% |
| Voters: 22. You may not vote on this poll | |||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#11
10-15-2005, 03:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: how long will you wait to go play on the growing party bbj?
Need at least 4 players dealt in to qualify for the BBJ.
-DeathDonkey 
|
|
#12
10-15-2005, 03:30 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: how long will you wait to go play on the growing party bbj?
[ QUOTE ]
Aside: Would playing heads up on a BBJ table be a good idea? I feel like it is since the regular rake is still capped at $1 and we would get more of the prize money, right? [/ QUOTE ] even if the rules allowed it, (edit) NO the more people the better. your chance of having the bad beat hit decreases hugely w/less players (far more than the additional prize share makes up for.) but if you also consider the addiitonal # of hands you could play headsup, as opposed to ring, it might theoretically make sense (although, i'm almost positive it still wouldn't) and even if it did, aren't you getting a little greedy [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]
|
|
#13
10-15-2005, 03:32 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: how long will you wait to go play on the growing party bbj?
Add in the fact that you don't even qualify for the jackpot unless there ar 4 players at the table and I think it's slightly less EV than you are thinking.
(wonders if they take $0.50 JP-drop when 2 or 3 players...I doubt they do since it's not eligible...but wouldn't be surprised).
|
|
|
|
Linear Mode
