|
|
|
|
#1
12-25-2005, 03:05 PM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Scarecard semibluff, what U guys think?
[ QUOTE ]
Villian is a fish, like or not like? [/ QUOTE ] I stopped reading here, semi-bluffing fish is generally not a good idea. 
|
|
#2
12-25-2005, 06:44 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Scarecard semibluff, what U guys think?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Villian is a fish, like or not like? [/ QUOTE ] I stopped reading here, semi-bluffing fish is generally not a good idea. [/ QUOTE ] Are you saying that there is only one kind of fish? Are all fishes calling stations? I think a fish in general in a limit game is a player who calls too much. In NL it can be to plain bad, not just calling too much
|
|
#3
12-25-2005, 10:33 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Scarecard semibluff, what U guys think?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Villian is a fish, like or not like? [/ QUOTE ] I stopped reading here, semi-bluffing fish is generally not a good idea. [/ QUOTE ] Are you saying that there is only one kind of fish? Are all fishes calling stations? I think a fish in general in a limit game is a player who calls too much. In NL it can be to plain bad, not just calling too much [/ QUOTE ] By definition, a fish is a player that calls too frequently and bets too small and infrequently so that they do not charge enough for good hands. They play many hands and passively. Therefore, when a "fish" bets it is usually with a hand they like.
|
 |
|
|
Hybrid Mode
