|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should this have been protected on the flop?
[ QUOTE ]
Supposedly not having enough money at the table to cap every street is better. thread [/ QUOTE ] Not running out of money during a hand is better, period, dot, end of discussion, site any reference you want. Running out of money when you have a winning hand is a catastrophe. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should this have been protected on the flop?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Supposedly not having enough money at the table to cap every street is better. thread [/ QUOTE ] Not running out of money during a hand is better, period, dot, end of discussion, site any reference you want. Running out of money when you have a winning hand is a catastrophe. [/ QUOTE ] read the thread....... |
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should this have been protected on the flop?
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Supposedly not having enough money at the table to cap every street is better. thread [/ QUOTE ] Not running out of money during a hand is better, period, dot, end of discussion, site any reference you want. Running out of money when you have a winning hand is a catastrophe. [/ QUOTE ] read the thread....... [/ QUOTE ] I've read every word, and anyone who advocates short stacking is wrong and can just like it. If I flop AAK with AA and get all in on the turn, I may as well make icicles in my freezer so I can jam them in my eyes. |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Should this have been protected on the flop?
[ QUOTE ]
I've read every word, and anyone who advocates short stacking is wrong and can just like it. If I flop AAK with AA and get all in on the turn, I may as well make icicles in my freezer so I can jam them in my eyes. [/ QUOTE ] I agree. BUT, Since I was outdrawn on this hand I was glad I was shortstacked. Hows that for results oriented thinking? [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img] |
|
|