#11
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 13BB/100 is possible in 5/10 (LC)
[ QUOTE ]
13BB/100 over 4.7k can't be all variance [/ QUOTE ] So, are you going to start posting here and help us out or not? |
#12
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 13BB/100 is possible in 5/10 (LC)
[ QUOTE ]
13BB/100 over 4.7k can't be all variance [/ QUOTE ] No offense, but this is the fundamental error you seem to be overlooking. |
#13
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 13BB/100 is possible in 5/10 (LC)
[ QUOTE ]
13BB/100 over 4.7k can't be all variance [/ QUOTE ] I bet we can all pick out longterm losers from our DB's that have won 10bb+/100 over a 5K stretch of hands... |
#14
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 13BB/100 is possible in 5/10 (LC)
[ QUOTE ]
13BB/100 over 4.7k can't be all variance [/ QUOTE ] i ran 12BB/100 for the first 5-6K hands at 10/20. trust me. it means NOTHING. |
#15
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 13BB/100 is possible in 5/10 (LC)
I think you guys are not givng the OP enough credit, 58% W$SD is an attainable long term stat.
|
#16
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 13BB/100 is possible in 5/10 (LC)
Your cool man, do you do coaching? Maybe you can help me work on my winrate. Here are my stats. I feel im almost there with a 12bb/100 winrate but maybe after you coaching I can reach your level of 13bb/100
|
#17
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 13BB/100 is possible in 5/10 (LC)
[ QUOTE ]
Great sample size. [/ QUOTE ] |
#18
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 13BB/100 is possible in 5/10 (LC)
Not quite 60 hands, but multiply the winrate by 6 if you want the effect of a full sample size.
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 13BB/100 is possible in 5/10 (LC)
HA!
|
#20
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 13BB/100 is possible in 5/10 (LC)
Uh, I'll be odd man out and tell you that at least your stats are decent (steal blinds more... way more).
Here's a HU for sample sizes: anything less than 50k is vague at best, anything under 20k is a complete joke. |
|
|