Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Science, Math, and Philosophy

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #141  
Old 11-02-2005, 09:41 PM
purnell purnell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 154
Default Re: Evidence AGAINST Christianity

[ QUOTE ]
Whereas you are the genius troll who maintains that "experienced" pot smokers do not suffer impairment in ability to drive when stoned as do drunks. Lay off the weed before posting.

[/ QUOTE ]

You are making an ad hominem argument. You are also once again ignoring objective evidence in favor of your unsubstantiated beliefs.


http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/Misc...20808%20939.htm
Reply With Quote
  #142  
Old 11-02-2005, 10:36 PM
RJT RJT is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 111
Default Re: Evidence AGAINST Christianity

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Whereas you are the genius troll who maintains that "experienced" pot smokers do not suffer impairment in ability to drive when stoned as do drunks. Lay off the weed before posting.

[/ QUOTE ]

You are making an ad hominem argument. You are also once again ignoring objective evidence in favor of your unsubstantiated beliefs.


http://www.druglibrary.org/schaffer/Misc...20808%20939.htm

[/ QUOTE ]

purnell,

Had I not assumed that Bluff did not equate the two levels of impairment, I would have corrected him already, purnell. There is some impairment to driving while stoned, although no where near the degree that alcohol impairs driving. (Many of us here could have told the DOT that and saved us taxpayers who knows how many $$$ with this study.)

If Bluff equates the levels of impairment then he does stand corrected.

RJT
Reply With Quote
  #143  
Old 11-03-2005, 11:54 AM
purnell purnell is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 154
Default Re: Evidence AGAINST Christianity

I was under the impression that he was equating the two. It is clear that THC intoxication impairs one's ability to safely drive a car in traffic, and if the poster to whom Bluff was referring believes that it doesn't, he is also ignoring the evidence.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:01 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.