|
|
#1
10-29-2005, 06:08 PM
|
|||
|
|||
AA v. two 2+2ers
bakku, blumpkin22, DeathDonkey and I are screwing around at a 9-handed Commerce 3/6 table.
blumpkin22 raises UTG, DeathDonkey 3-bets in the hijack. I am in the BB with A[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], A[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img]. blumpkin22 is tilting pretty badly after some pretty sick beats. He's playing a little too LAGgy. DeathDonkey is running at about 100/75/3. He's playing to win every pot he enters. He's still being somewhat observant when someone like me enters the hand and realizes at those points he might need to actually have a hand. So I just call intending to get tricky post flop. blumpkin22 just calls. Flop: T[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 3[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img] Line? 
|
|
#2
10-29-2005, 06:12 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AA v. two 2+2ers
Is your range really that different when you call instead of capping? Cap and lead PF > call and get tricky OOP. Since you decided to get all FPS on us I'd checkraise the flop.
Rob
|
|
#3
10-29-2005, 06:14 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AA v. two 2+2ers
[ QUOTE ]
Is your range really that different when you call instead of capping? Cap and lead PF > call and get tricky OOP. Since you decided to get all FPS on us I'd checkraise the flop. Rob [/ QUOTE ] I haven't been donking around enough for them to not put me on a monster if I cap. I wanted extra big street bets.
|
|
#4
10-29-2005, 06:15 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AA v. two 2+2ers
checkraise the flop/cap if possible.
lead out on 4th and 5th.
|
|
#5
10-29-2005, 06:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AA v. two 2+2ers
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Is your range really that different when you call instead of capping? Cap and lead PF > call and get tricky OOP. Since you decided to get all FPS on us I'd checkraise the flop. Rob [/ QUOTE ] I haven't been donking around enough for them to not put me on a monster if I cap. I wanted extra big street bets. [/ QUOTE ] My point wasn't necessarily that you have a monster if you cap. It's that against them, you've got a monster if you don't cap. Rob
|
|
#6
10-29-2005, 06:19 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AA v. two 2+2ers
I'd check call here, and go apeshit on the turn. Leading here getting DD to raise it wouldn't be a bad thing either
[ QUOTE ] DeathDonkey is running at about 100/75/3. [/ QUOTE ] hahahahahaha, nice
|
|
#7
10-29-2005, 06:22 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AA v. two 2+2ers
[ QUOTE ]
My point wasn't necessarily that you have a monster if you cap. It's that against them, you've got a monster if you don't cap. Rob [/ QUOTE ] I'm not sure why you think this.
|
|
#8
10-29-2005, 06:23 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AA v. two 2+2ers
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] My point wasn't necessarily that you have a monster if you cap. It's that against them, you've got a monster if you don't cap. Rob [/ QUOTE ] I'm not sure why you think this. [/ QUOTE ] What's your calling range, calling two cold in the BB against these two players, when one is a UTG raise (albeit tilting) and the other 3-bet the UTG raise (albeit by a retarded donkeylag). IMO if you're in a position here where you significantly disguising your hand by calling then you're probably not capping enough hands against these two when they're playing like this. Rob
|
|
#9
10-29-2005, 06:26 PM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: AA v. two 2+2ers
[ QUOTE ]
What's your calling range, calling two cold in the BB against these two players, when one is a UTG raise (albeit tilting) and the other 3-bet the UTG raise (albeit by a retarded donkeylag). IMO if you're in a position here where you significantly disguising your hand by calling then you're probably not capping enough hands against these two when they're playing like this. Rob [/ QUOTE ] We don't have much of a history.
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
