|
|
#33
11-30-2005, 03:06 AM
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Win rates
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] How's full tilt for NL? [/ QUOTE ] weak-tight. Very little aggression PF. [/ QUOTE ] I'm starting an account there tomorrow to get the bonus and rebuild my NL roll... I've been watching the lower stakes NL games and they seem ok, beatable. I feel like a lot of newbies are attracted to full tilt because of all the coverage on ESPN, etc... 
|
|
#35
11-30-2005, 03:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Win rates
[ QUOTE ]
While we're hear.. any Stars $200 regulars around? Or are all of you dirtbags on Party? Who are the top $200 Stars regulars guys? [/ QUOTE ] I play the $200 Stars regularly
|
|
#36
11-30-2005, 06:59 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Win rates
[ QUOTE ]
If I could take back all the stupid [censored] I have done I guarentee my winrate would be 10-12 PTBB. I think most of us move up to 400NL before we get to that level though. I would say 8PTBB is probably a good target for sustainable winrate. If u can sustain that for awhile u should have the roll to move up after that. [/ QUOTE ] If I could take back all the stupid [censored] I have done it would boost my winrate aswell, but isnt that true for most players?
|
|
#37
11-30-2005, 08:19 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Win rates
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] If I could take back all the stupid [censored] I have done I guarentee my winrate would be 10-12 PTBB. I think most of us move up to 400NL before we get to that level though. I would say 8PTBB is probably a good target for sustainable winrate. If u can sustain that for awhile u should have the roll to move up after that. [/ QUOTE ] If I could take back all the stupid [censored] I have done it would boost my winrate aswell, but isnt that true for most players? [/ QUOTE ] Yes, plus you have to factor in all the stupid [censored] you do that make you money, either because you suck out or because the super tight aggressive player whose big bet you called was actually bluffing for once.
|
|
#38
11-30-2005, 09:51 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Win rates
[ QUOTE ]
have you tried full tilt? [/ QUOTE ] Been on it for two weeks. Between 10-15k players in prime time (Party and Stars have 50k). Plenty of NL 100 and 200 tables at night, slow during the day. Very weak-tight. Played about 750 hands last night and only 3 or 4 of pre-flop raises ever got called (I average 10-12 PFR). I still think Stars is better. I will fund my Party account next week once I clear some more of my FT bonus.
|
|
#39
11-30-2005, 09:57 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Win rates
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] have you tried full tilt? [/ QUOTE ] Been on it for two weeks. Between 10-15k players in prime time (Party and Stars have 50k). Plenty of NL 100 and 200 tables at night, slow during the day. Very weak-tight. Played about 750 hands last night and only 3 or 4 of pre-flop raises ever got called (I average 10-12 PFR). I still think Stars is better. I will fund my Party account next week once I clear some more of my FT bonus. [/ QUOTE ] How does the bonus clear once you hit 1/2NL there? I know a lot of sites don't clear well when playing NL until you get to at least 1/2.
|
|
#40
11-30-2005, 10:07 AM
|
|||
|
|||
|
Re: Win rates
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] While we're hear.. any Stars $200 regulars around? Or are all of you dirtbags on Party? Who are the top $200 Stars regulars guys? [/ QUOTE ] I play the $200 Stars regularly [/ QUOTE ] Me too.... I would like to know who Nitewin is ?? This guy was up 4-6 Buyins on 5 tables on saturday and similar on sunday ..... 1100 on a $200 table is pretty impressive...but $800+ on 4 tables is equally impreesive...especially as he was something like a 32/19 or similar....
|
 |
|
|
Linear Mode
