Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Shorthanded
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 09-30-2005, 04:53 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Short Handed VS Back of the Full Table

They say that you should play a full table game like a SH game if its folded around to you in late middle or late position. But is this really the case? The blinds eating your money away isnt nearly as pressing an issue at full games as it is in shorthanded games.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 09-30-2005, 04:55 PM
Jgents Jgents is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Beneath I-95 in a tent
Posts: 200
Default Re: Short Handed VS Back of the Full Table

You don't like to take money uncontested?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 09-30-2005, 05:02 PM
DMBFan23 DMBFan23 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: I don\'t want a large Farva
Posts: 417
Default Re: Short Handed VS Back of the Full Table

Ed Miller had a magazine article talking about this, it's roughly the same. you don't get 'eaten away by the blinds' because the blinds have equity, how much equity will depend on how much people are stealing, was the basic gist of his article.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 09-30-2005, 05:10 PM
random random is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 0
Default Re: Short Handed VS Back of the Full Table

There's also some theory that since a bunch of people have folded, we assume they had trash hands, making it more likely that the people around back have good hands.

There's also some theory that since a bunch of people have folded, we assume they had trash hands, making it more likely that the people around back have good hands.

Saying that the blinds are not eating you up as much in a full game, so you don't have to play as loose around back is flawed. You make those plays in shorthanded games because they're profitable, and not because you're worried about getting blinded to death.

[ QUOTE ]
They say that you should play a full table game like a SH game if its folded around to you in late middle or late position.

[/ QUOTE ]This is a good general guideline and it works both ways (play shorthanded like you're at a full table and four people have folded to you). On the flip side, some people have a hard time adjusting and you can capitalize. For example, in a 6max game, you raise utg and someone might think "oh shits, he raised utg, i should fold this mediocre hand" or raising in MP at a full table they may think you have a better hand just because you're opening with half the table to act. It may be hard to recognize this in other people, but I'm sure money is being made because of this.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 09-30-2005, 05:13 PM
kidcolin kidcolin is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Boston to Sacramento
Posts: 120
Default Re: Short Handed VS Back of the Full Table

[ QUOTE ]
They say that you should play a SH game like a full ring game when its folded around to you in late middle or late position. But is this really the case? The blinds eating your money away isnt nearly as pressing an issue at full games as it is in shorthanded games.

[/ QUOTE ]

Fixed your post. Should answer your question.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.