Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Small Stakes Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-30-2005, 03:26 PM
TheHammer24 TheHammer24 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Changing my skirt
Posts: 335
Default Re: Wierd Hand

Do you really thinkg SB is 3-Betting this pf w.o JJ-AA with those stats? I capped pf to take control of the hand in position. On the flop, a 3-bet puts a lot of bets in there when I'm likely behind of SB. If he caps it sucks. Anyway, I haven't played in like 2 weeks, so my game is off. I lost 25 BB's last night, which isn't out of the ordinary, but I would have like a decent winning session.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-30-2005, 03:40 PM
crunchy1 crunchy1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Boogie Woogie!!
Posts: 785
Default Re: Wierd Hand

[ QUOTE ]
Do you really thinkg SB is 3-Betting this pf w.o JJ-AA with those stats?

[/ QUOTE ]
Top 5% of hands would be something like 99+, AJs+, KQs, AKo. You've got decent equity against this range. Note that his PFR matches his VP$IP - this leads me to believe one of two things: 1) He's raising almost every time he enters a pot (which means ALL the hands I mentioned above) 2) your read isn't very good. I think you're a decent poster - but I'm more inclined to believe #2. I can't ever recall seeing a 5% VP$IP player in several hundred thousand hands.

[ QUOTE ]
I capped pf to take control of the hand in position. On the flop, a 3-bet puts a lot of bets in there when I'm likely behind of SB.

[/ QUOTE ]
Then why not fold the flop. If you're sure your behind - you don't have odds to continue. Fold. Otherwise.... raise that [censored] up. You've got plenty of equity against a reasonable SB range and the donkey.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-30-2005, 03:48 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Wierd Hand

[ QUOTE ]
Top 5% of hands would be something like 99+, AJs+, KQs, AKo. You've got decent equity against this range.

[/ QUOTE ]

He's 5% preflop raise, not 5% preflop 3bet.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-30-2005, 03:58 PM
crunchy1 crunchy1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Boogie Woogie!!
Posts: 785
Default Re: Wierd Hand

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Top 5% of hands would be something like 99+, AJs+, KQs, AKo. You've got decent equity against this range.

[/ QUOTE ]

He's 5% preflop raise, not 5% preflop 3bet.

[/ QUOTE ]
He's also a 5% VP$IP... If he's playing 5% of his hands and also raising 5% of his hands he's raising every hand he enters the pot with. I understand that the 3-bet means more than a raise. In this case however, I think you're looking at a wider range than QQ-AA. The presence of the idiot in the pot certainly gives us enough equity to push our hand a bit. If we 3-bet the flop and SB folds and two cards bigger than a jack we've done something good.

If there was another read to suggest that we are, in fact, only looking at QQ-AA here then we shouldn't be capping PF or putting any bets in after the flop without a set.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-30-2005, 03:59 PM
thejameser thejameser is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: I\'m a FAG:Frugal Aggressive(Not that there is anything wrong with that)
Posts: 410
Default Re: Wierd Hand

if he is raising everytime he would be 5/100
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-30-2005, 04:02 PM
crunchy1 crunchy1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Boogie Woogie!!
Posts: 785
Default Re: Wierd Hand

[ QUOTE ]
if he is raising everytime he would be 5/100

[/ QUOTE ]
That's not the way that I understand PT calculates PFR. Perhaps I'm incorrect.

EDIT: Can the OP provide the # of hands, AF, WSD% and W$SD%... I'm just curious.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-31-2005, 01:17 AM
TheHammer24 TheHammer24 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Changing my skirt
Posts: 335
Default Re: Wierd Hand

[ QUOTE ]
if he is raising everytime he would be 5/100

[/ QUOTE ]

That's incorrect. If he's raising every hand he VP$IP it would be 5/5 20/20 100/100 etc. PFR can never be greater than VPIP
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-31-2005, 04:06 AM
crunchy1 crunchy1 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Boogie Woogie!!
Posts: 785
Default Re: Wierd Hand

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
if he is raising everytime he would be 5/100

[/ QUOTE ]

That's incorrect. If he's raising every hand he VP$IP it would be 5/5 20/20 100/100 etc. PFR can never be greater than VPIP

[/ QUOTE ]
That's what I thought.

I really think you need to decide on the flop if you've got equity against the SB. Either you're 3-betting and trying to knock out his high-card combos - or you're folding.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-31-2005, 09:38 AM
thejameser thejameser is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: I\'m a FAG:Frugal Aggressive(Not that there is anything wrong with that)
Posts: 410
Default Re: Wierd Hand

[ QUOTE ]
if he is raising everytime he would be 5/100

[/ QUOTE ]

delete. delete. I SAID DELETE!
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-30-2005, 04:47 PM
TheHammer24 TheHammer24 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Changing my skirt
Posts: 335
Default Re: Wierd Hand

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Do you really thinkg SB is 3-Betting this pf w.o JJ-AA with those stats?

[/ QUOTE ]
Top 5% of hands would be something like 99+, AJs+, KQs, AKo. You've got decent equity against this range. Note that his PFR matches his VP$IP - this leads me to believe one of two things: 1) He's raising almost every time he enters a pot (which means ALL the hands I mentioned above) 2) your read isn't very good. I think you're a decent poster - but I'm more inclined to believe #2. I can't ever recall seeing a 5% VP$IP player in several hundred thousand hands.

[/ QUOTE ]

He raises 5% of his hands. We should intuitively conclude that he 3 bets a lot less than that especially OP. Just because he's 5/5 doesn't mean he automatically plays AQs everytime for a raise regardless of circumstances. I'm thinking you are reading too far into this.

[ QUOTE ]
I capped pf to take control of the hand in position. On the flop, a 3-bet puts a lot of bets in there when I'm likely behind of SB. [ QUOTE ]

Then why not fold the flop. If you're sure your behind - you don't have odds to continue. Fold. Otherwise.... raise that [censored] up. You've got plenty of equity against a reasonable SB range and the donkey.

[/ QUOTE ]

[/ QUOTE ]



I think that this was the way to play the hand.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:09 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.