Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > PL/NL Texas Hold'em > Mid-, High-Stakes Pot- and No-Limit Hold'em
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 06-17-2005, 01:38 AM
steaknshake925 steaknshake925 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: u of i
Posts: 311
Default dropping the hammer on the weak-tights

everyone at the table is pretty solid but a little on the weak-tight side. this includes me. UTG's preflop raises are usually between $25--$40, so it was a small raise by him. people have been raising like 30 preflop and folding to a reraise to $65.

Party Poker No-Limit Hold'em, $ Hero (6 max, 5 handed) converter

SB ($2095)
Hero ($1320)
UTG ($1436.75)
MP ($193.45)
Button ($905)

Preflop: Hero is BB with 3[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 2[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img]. SB posts a blind of $5.
<font color="#CC3333">UTG raises to $25</font>, MP calls $25, Button calls $25, SB (poster) calls $20, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises to $135</font>.

thoughts? like, dislike?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 06-17-2005, 02:20 AM
THATWACOKID THATWACOKID is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: TEXAS
Posts: 389
Default Re: dropping the hammer on the weak-tights

Are you the guy from Indiana that was in Sports Illustrated?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 06-17-2005, 03:00 AM
Chr Chr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 49
Default Re: dropping the hammer on the weak-tights

I like this a lot.

I do that too when a minraiser (25 here is close to a minraise) drags 3-4 callers. I size my raise to around 10% of the stacksize of opp, so it will be wrong to go for set. Often you will get one caller trying to hit set anyway. My plan normally is to bet 2/3 - 3/4 of the pot on the flop if checked to, and then no more money in. I fold to serious action before me on flop.

Only thing I'm i doubt of here is that it is 6-max. I do it in full ring. I don't know if 6-max plays differently in this case.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 06-17-2005, 03:07 AM
Chr Chr is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Denmark
Posts: 49
Default Re: dropping the hammer on the weak-tights

ooopsss... didn't see the shortstack. I'm not happy about that. Shortstacks often like to gamble with 50/50 chances. You could be called or reraised all-in by suited A's or a pp and then you have no way to send him out on flop and you will have to show your hand. Not good!
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 06-17-2005, 06:00 AM
mgsimpleton mgsimpleton is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 0
Default Re: dropping the hammer on the weak-tights

[ QUOTE ]
Are you the guy from Indiana that was in Sports Illustrated?

[/ QUOTE ]

nh
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 06-17-2005, 06:02 AM
flawless_victory flawless_victory is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 144
Default Re: dropping the hammer on the weak-tights

looks fine, but i would not advise showing if noone calls.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 06-17-2005, 08:06 AM
fnord_too fnord_too is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Norfolk, VA
Posts: 672
Default Re: dropping the hammer on the weak-tights

I like this. I do this sort of thing a lot in tournies, but the opportunity does not come up often in ring games.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 06-17-2005, 07:32 PM
steaknshake925 steaknshake925 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: u of i
Posts: 311
Default Re: dropping the hammer on the weak-tights

[ QUOTE ]
ooopsss... didn't see the shortstack. I'm not happy about that. Shortstacks often like to gamble with 50/50 chances. You could be called or reraised all-in by suited A's or a pp and then you have no way to send him out on flop and you will have to show your hand. Not good!

[/ QUOTE ]

good point. UTG folded and the short-stacked UTG+1 went all in for about $50 more, everyone folded and I called and won against AJo. I always thought shortstacks might call less cuz i think they're probly playing scared money, like the last of their bankroll or something, but hmm, maybe not.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 06-17-2005, 07:37 PM
kagame kagame is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: lawrence, ks
Posts: 300
Default Re: dropping the hammer on the weak-tights

32 is a monster against AJ, i learned this from UB multitables
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 06-17-2005, 07:41 PM
iceman5 iceman5 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 38
Default Re: dropping the hammer on the weak-tights

Short stacks alot of time ARE playing scared money, but they also dont know what theyre doing most of the time.

They dont have enought money to play the hand out so they pick something they like and push in with it. 9 times out of 10, he will be dominated with AJ with this action, but he still pushes in.

Thats why you cant make that move with a short stack in the mix when you dont have him dominated.

Also, once the table sees you have 3,2 there, I wouldnt try it again anytime soon. Make the same play with AA.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.