Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Tournament Poker > One-table Tournaments
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-20-2005, 04:15 PM
durron597 durron597 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6
Default Re: set of aces, 4 straight on board.

[ QUOTE ]
I don't want to be rude, and I appreciate everyones advice, but many of you are not answering my question.

[/ QUOTE ]

We are trying to explain that the reason you are in such a difficult spot on the river is because you made a mistake on the flop.

On the river:

The pot has 5400 in it, and you have to call 600. You are getting 9:1. Harrington's rule says that your opponent is bluffing at least 10% of the time. Who knows, maybe he has AT/QT/JT. Call.

You can also run ICM on this and plug in the probabilities associated with having the best hand, but you've only given 13800 chips and PokerRoom SnGs have 15000 so you must've made a mistake somewhere.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 06-20-2005, 04:28 PM
Dr_Jeckyl_00 Dr_Jeckyl_00 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 222
Default Re: set of aces, 4 straight on board.

you should not try and extract w/ a scary board take your money on the flop and be happy that you're ahead. As far as folding the river, you should. He called your large bets, and now he is leading the betting w/ an amount he thinks you will call. He made his hand, save some money and fold... you missed your opportunity.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 06-20-2005, 04:28 PM
chopchoi chopchoi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 378
Default Re: set of aces, 4 straight on board.

[ QUOTE ]

You can also run ICM on this and plug in the probabilities associated with having the best hand, but you've only given 13800 chips and PokerRoom SnGs have 15000 so you must've made a mistake somewhere.

[/ QUOTE ]

Sorry about that. I post from work, and don't have access to the HH, or I would just post that. Anyway, I know I had 3900 and change, and the short stack had about 2,500. SB had a little more than me.

I don't remember what the other guy had. I gave him 3,500 because I thought would make it all add up to 15,000 (+ or - 200), but I screwed up the math.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 06-20-2005, 04:33 PM
Freudian Freudian is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 24
Default Re: set of aces, 4 straight on board.

[ QUOTE ]

I considered that, but then I thought, "There are only 8 cards in the deck that scare me (4 tens and 4 kings). The odds are that one won't come, and even if one comes, there's a good chance it won't help him, and even if it helps him, I have a strong redraw." So trying to milk him seemed like a good idea at the time.

[/ QUOTE ]

With that reasoning I assume you don't protect your hands against flush draws either? Afterall, there are only nine cards that can hurt you.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 06-20-2005, 04:33 PM
nokona13 nokona13 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 246
Default Re: set of aces, 4 straight on board.

[ QUOTE ]
you should not try and extract w/ a scary board take your money on the flop and be happy that you're ahead. As far as folding the river, you should. He called your large bets, and now he is leading the betting w/ an amount he thinks you will call. He made his hand, save some money and fold... you missed your opportunity.

[/ QUOTE ]

This is wrong. The bet is 600 and you're getting almost 10:1, and opponent could still have QQ, JJ, AQ, maybe QJs or JTs... OP shouldn't be in this spot, but since he is, hero calls...
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 06-20-2005, 04:37 PM
durron597 durron597 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Posts: 6
Default Re: set of aces, 4 straight on board.

Alright using stacks of:

SB - 4200
You - 3900
Short - 2600
Other guy - 4300

Then if you fold your equity is: 13.8%
If you call and win: 36%
If you call and lose: 9.3%

If the probability of winning is x, then $EV(call) =
36 * x + 9.3 * (1 - x) = 26.7 * x + 9.3, which needs to be bigger than 13.8%

Thus x > 16.85%.... which means you need to have the best time approx 1/6 or better times in order to call. This isn't fully accounted for by Harrington's bluff rule, but I think it's accounted for by the the times the ten on the turn gave him two pair or he has QQ/JJ. I call.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 06-20-2005, 04:42 PM
Dr_Jeckyl_00 Dr_Jeckyl_00 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: CT
Posts: 222
Default Re: set of aces, 4 straight on board.

[ QUOTE ]

This is wrong. The bet is 600 and you're getting almost 10:1, and opponent could still have QQ, JJ, AQ, maybe QJs or JTs... OP shouldn't be in this spot, but since he is, hero calls...

[/ QUOTE ]

I suppose for $600 more he should call, but in my observation when a player calls big bets then a card comes and he starts betting he almost always made his hand.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 06-20-2005, 04:42 PM
TheNoodleMan TheNoodleMan is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Bloomington , IN
Posts: 325
Default Re: set of aces, 4 straight on board.

[ QUOTE ]
I don't want to be rude, and I appreciate everyones advice, but many of you are not answering my question. I did not ask if I should have pushed the flop, I asked if I should call the river. It's not just this post either. Often, when I read threds that other people have started, I notcie that those who reply do not answer the question that was asked.

I don't mind your saying that I should have pushed the flop, but please try to answer the original question es well (e.g. "You should have pushed the flop, but since you didn't, you should...").

Thanks, and I apolgize if I offended anyone.

[/ QUOTE ]
You are looking for a cure to the disease, and shunning the vaccination.
a little bit of prevention goes a long way.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 06-20-2005, 04:48 PM
Sean D Sean D is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Eastern Shore
Posts: 98
Default Re: set of aces, 4 straight on board.

Looks like it may be a blocking bet by two pair, lower set. I think you are definitely good more than 1/6th of the time. Barring a great read on the player, I make a crying call.
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 06-20-2005, 04:54 PM
chopchoi chopchoi is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 378
Default Re: set of aces, 4 straight on board.

The more I think about this, the more convinced I become that I was right not to push.

If he has KT, I'm going to pay him off one way or the other, so thais doesn't matter. What we need to establish is, how often will I be ahead on the flop, but lose the hand on the turn?

The only cards I fear are the 4 K's and the 4 T's. The odds are about 5:1 that one of these cards won't come. Now, if one does come, I only lose if he makes a straight. So, If a T comes, he needs to have a K, and if a K comes, he must have a T. Of all the hands he raised me with PF, how many would have either a K or a T? Half seems like a reasonable estimat. so we'll say he has a K 25% of the time, and a T 25% of the time. So, a scare card comes one time in 5, and it makes him a straight 1 time in 4. So, he will only take the lead on the turn 1 time in 20, and even then, I hvae a ten out re-draw. I lose here only about 4% of the time. Anyone who says I need to protect my hand is too paranoid.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:56 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.