My main problem with Moneymaker.

[Easy E]

Sorry, it's too early to determine if he's a solid player or not.

See me two years from now.

[sleepyjoeyt]

I wrote a rather scathing response last week which was apparently deleted so I'll try to be a little more civil now:

Where did someone sling a personal insult at you?

All I read is you saying Moneymaker isn't that great, and others saying why not just worry about your own game and not about others.

Why did you take this as someone attacking you?

Why are you portraying yourself as some sort of victim?

Grow up.

[BreakEvenPlayer]

[ QUOTE ]
You are also one of the guys who has kept up with my and helped my thread grow, so I respect and value your input

[/ QUOTE ]

So that's what this is about?

[Dynasty]

[ QUOTE ]
Sorry, it's too early to determine if he's a solid player or not.

See me two years from now.

[/ QUOTE ]

You shouldn't need two years to determine whether a player is solid or not. It shouldn't take more than two hours of playing with him. If you're only seeing the guy on TV, you can have a little more time.

[Daliman]

[ QUOTE ]
Further, MM has a *great* poker name. Seriously, how can you not root for a guy with that name being a pro player.. it's like a basketball player named 'Dunkmachine'...

[/ QUOTE ]
Or if a golfer was named Woods...oh, never mind. [img]/images/graemlins/wink.gif[/img]

[charlie_t_jr]

[quoteYou shouldn't need two years to determine whether a player is solid or not. It shouldn't take more than two hours of playing with him. If you're only seeing the guy on TV, you can have a little more time.

[/ QUOTE ]

But we forget he's really just starting out. I'm just starting out, and hope 2 years of experience and study does much for my game.

Question is will MM improve during the next 2yrs or fade away...

[coolcody]

You are all on a bunch of bad beats.