Do you call heads up in this situation?

[Jonathan]

[ QUOTE ]
The fact that you ask this question means that you seriously need to reevaluate your SNG game.

[/ QUOTE ]

Thats exactly what I am trying to do. Thats why I am bringing
this up. Its clear that virtually everyone (except me) thinks
that this is an automatic fold. But so far, no one has actually
given a REASON, except for the gentleman who said the hand
is a 52:48 dog to a random hand. If thats true, then I agree
its a fold. But how do you determine that 87s is a 52:48
dog to a random hand?

Thanks for all the input....I appreciate it.

Suerte,
Jonathan

[adanthar]

[ QUOTE ]
But how do you determine that 87s is a 52:48
dog to a random hand?

[/ QUOTE ]

www.pokerstove.com

[kyro]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
But how do you determine that 87s is a 52:48
dog to a random hand?

[/ QUOTE ]

www.pokerstove.com

[/ QUOTE ]

If you need PokerStove to realize this is an awful call...yikes.

[Jonathan]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
But how do you determine that 87s is a 52:48
dog to a random hand?

[/ QUOTE ]

www.pokerstove.com

[/ QUOTE ]

OK....I see you can input a range of hands for the second
player. Thanks for the useful info. So I see it is
fold.

In the actual hand, opponent had 55 in which case it was
a dead heat. I caught a 7 on the flop which held up,
and my opponent went ballistic berating me for a HORRIBLE
call.

I guess everyone here agrees with him [img]/images/graemlins/ooo.gif[/img]

Suerte,
Jonathan

Is Jonathan for real?

[Jonathan]

[ QUOTE ]
Is Jonathan for real?

[/ QUOTE ]
What do you mean, ucla? You think I'm pulling
the groups leg here?

Jonathan

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Is Jonathan for real?

[/ QUOTE ]
What do you mean, ucla? You think I'm pulling
the groups leg here?

Jonathan

[/ QUOTE ]

Are you?

[Jonathan]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Is Jonathan for real?

[/ QUOTE ]
What do you mean, ucla? You think I'm pulling
the groups leg here?

Jonathan

[/ QUOTE ]

Are you?

[/ QUOTE ]

What would make you think that?