Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 02-14-2005, 04:08 AM
llamaoo7 llamaoo7 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 6
Default Was I suppose to value bet?

This is my first post on 2+2, so I hope it's a good one. I've been lurking the past month or so and the advice given here has been proven to be the best by far for microlimits. Thanks guys and SSH. Feel free to give general comments about the hand and how I played it anywhere.

MP2, CO, and SB are fish. BB is solid.
Party Poker 0.5/1 Hold'em (10 handed) converter

Preflop: Hero is UTG+1 with K[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img], Q[img]/images/graemlins/club.gif[/img]. MP1 posts a blind of $0.5.
<font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, <font color="#CC3333">Hero raises</font>, <font color="#666666">2 folds</font>, MP2 calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, CO calls, <font color="#666666">1 fold</font>, SB calls, BB calls.

UTG with KQo raises on Party .5/1 at a loosy goosy table, right?

Flop: (11 SB) Q[img]/images/graemlins/heart.gif[/img], 9[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img], J[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font>
SB checks, BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, MP2 calls, CO calls, SB calls, BB calls.

Sweet. Top pair good kicker but two flush on the board. Autobet.
Turn: (8 BB) 6[img]/images/graemlins/spade.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(5 players)</font>
SB checks, BB checks, <font color="#CC3333">Hero bets</font>, MP2 calls, CO calls, SB calls, BB folds.

This card didn't help anyone so autobet.

River: (12 BB) 6[img]/images/graemlins/diamond.gif[/img] <font color="#0000FF">(4 players)</font>
SB checks, Hero checks, MP2 checks, CO checks.

Why were they calling down? On a draw of some sorts? Checked in case of a flush (SB had check raised rivers before) or someone had a 6.

Final Pot: 12 BB
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 02-14-2005, 04:14 AM
Shillx Shillx is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Frog and Peach Pub, Downtown SLO
Posts: 4,478
Default Re: Was I suppose to value bet?

I play it the same way for what it's worth.

Welcome to the forum.

Brad
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 02-14-2005, 04:17 AM
Niediam Niediam is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Michigan
Posts: 823
Default Re: Was I suppose to value bet?

You definately missed a value bet. Why do you think you are behind? Nobody has shown any aggression whatsoever. There are quite a few hands that will give you an extra bet here such as Qx, JT, or AJ.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 02-14-2005, 08:11 AM
Bob Moss Bob Moss is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: New England
Posts: 110
Default Re: Was I suppose to value bet?

Solid. You can't really bet the river because you're out of position and you don't want to be raised. Definitely check and call a bet. The other streets are automatic.

Bob
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 02-14-2005, 10:34 AM
sy_or_bust sy_or_bust is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 169
Default Re: Was I suppose to value bet?

Nice hand. Easy check/call.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 02-14-2005, 10:39 AM
DMBFan23 DMBFan23 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: I don\'t want a large Farva
Posts: 417
Default Re: Was I suppose to value bet?

yo llamaoo,

with that many people in, it's easy to get scared of the flush, but since you happen to be against three bad players who will call with any piece of the board (including worse Q's, a J, or a 9), you should value bet. and since they're passive, you can fold if one of them raises if you'd like.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 02-14-2005, 10:44 AM
Twitch1977 Twitch1977 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 29
Default Re: Was I suppose to value bet?

I'd bet this river pretty much every time, the amount your bet will win in the times your top pair is good will more then make up for the amount you'll lose when someone hit their flush. IMO

T
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 02-14-2005, 10:49 AM
aron aron is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 233
Default Re: Was I suppose to value bet?

I'll bet that river.

-aron
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 02-14-2005, 10:52 AM
Nick Royale Nick Royale is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 270
Default Re: Was I suppose to value bet?

[ QUOTE ]
I play it the same way for what it's worth.

[/ QUOTE ]
On a loose table, wouldn't this be an easy value bet? We have no reason to believe anybody holds a 6 and those players will call to the river with much weaker draws than the flushdraw. And they will pay of with a lot of hands.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 02-14-2005, 10:53 AM
Nick Royale Nick Royale is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 270
Default Re: Was I suppose to value bet?

[ QUOTE ]
with that many people in, it's easy to get scared of the flush, but since you happen to be against three bad players who will call with any piece of the board (including worse Q's, a J, or a 9), you should value bet. and since they're passive, you can fold if one of them raises if you'd like.

[/ QUOTE ]
Agree.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.