Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Other Topics > Sporting Events
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 12-04-2005, 05:33 PM
Jack of Arcades Jack of Arcades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: not the gay jack
Posts: 2,275
Default Re: Bears in trouble

[ QUOTE ]
Carson Palmer threw 3 TD's in that game. I'd say that's "looking pretty good" against any defense.

[/ QUOTE ]

All right, you got me. Carson Palmer, one of the three best QBs in the league, had a great game. Anybody else?
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 12-04-2005, 05:40 PM
uw_madtown uw_madtown is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Slaying Party Fish
Posts: 654
Default Re: Bears in trouble

[ QUOTE ]
Madtown,

I've talked about this before in its own topic. Favre has a) gotten no help this year and b) played a lot of very tough defenses. It's not like turnovers are a new thing. This is the fourth time in his career he's thrown twenty picks in a season.

[/ QUOTE ]

1 of those seasons was 93. I was watching in 93, he sucked. Period. His first two years were bad. Lots of silly interceptions.

2 of those seasons were years where he had 30+ TDs -- and had a solid team, both offense and defense, around him. Better supporting cast means you can take more chances with turning the ball over -- they're more likely to make the play, and if they don't, your above average defense is more likely to make a stop on them.

The fact is that Favre has never been good at avoiding interceptions because he forces the ball. A lot. Which is fine if you have a solid defense that can cover your ass, and/or a solid recieving corp that can make plays on those kinds of throws. But he doesn't have those things right now, and it's really inexcusable that he continues to try and force some of these plays.

Having watched him play for years, coming from Wisconsin while not being a Pack fan, he really is a high-risk QB. Given that the Packers are in bad shape largely due to injury, but weren't completely out of the division race since that division is pretty bad all around, some of these interceptions are the difference between being 2-10 and 5-7 or 6-6.

If he was as good as everyone thinks he is, he'd be able to scale back some of those risky plays. But he can't. He is, and always has been, a very skilled but reckless QB.

I don't see how "the turnovers have always been there" is an adequate defense. He used to have a team around him where turnovers weren't as big an issue. He doesn't any more. He's still throwing INTs though. Some of them can be chalked up to WR inexperience, but a fair amount of them are just TERRIBLE throws/decision making on Favre's part.
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 12-04-2005, 05:46 PM
David04 David04 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 175
Default Re: Bears in trouble

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Carson Palmer threw 3 TD's in that game. I'd say that's "looking pretty good" against any defense.

[/ QUOTE ]

All right, you got me. Carson Palmer, one of the three best QBs in the league, had a great game. Anybody else?

[/ QUOTE ]
Don't get it twisted, I'm not trying to say that Palmer picked the Bears D apart, or totally embarrassed them, because he didn't. But you are trying to say that the Bears defense is so great, NOBODY has performed well against them. Which is simply untrue.
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 12-04-2005, 06:10 PM
Pudge714 Pudge714 is offline
Member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 58
Default Re: Bears in trouble

Favre does have a solid defense. Jim Bates has turned this squad into a comptent unit. His recievers are not that bad, I would take Driver, Ferguson, and Bubba, over the Eagles, Lions, Falcons, 49ers, Seahawks (Granted they have Shaun, which helps a little bit) Jets, Browns, Titans, Chiefs. And I might take them over the Broncos and Pats WR's
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 12-04-2005, 06:16 PM
Jack of Arcades Jack of Arcades is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: not the gay jack
Posts: 2,275
Default Re: Bears in trouble

Um, no, I was actually asking - did anyone look good against them? I haven't been able to see many bears games this year.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 12-04-2005, 06:22 PM
David04 David04 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 175
Default Re: Bears in trouble

[ QUOTE ]
Um, no, I was actually asking - did anyone look good against them? I haven't been able to see many bears games this year.

[/ QUOTE ]
I thought you were trying to say that nobody has looked good against the Bears. Sorry for the misunderstanding.
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 12-04-2005, 09:41 PM
BWebb BWebb is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 91
Default Re: Bears in trouble

[ QUOTE ]
Um, no, I was actually asking - did anyone look good against them? I haven't been able to see many bears games this year.

[/ QUOTE ]

I wouldn't go saying they are the best defense in the last 5 years. Look at this pitiful schedule:

Washington
Detroit
Cincinatti
Cleveland
Minnesota
Baltimore
Detroit
Saints
49ers
Panthers
Tampa Bay
Green Bay

Only two decent offenses on the whole list. The best one scored 24 and had their QB throw 3 TDs. They'll have to do something in the playoffs for me to buy into their greatness. I'm not saying they're not good, but I don't think they can be called great yet.
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 12-04-2005, 11:56 PM
MyTurn2Raise MyTurn2Raise is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: b/n Chicago,Champaign,St. Louis
Posts: 320
Default Re: Bears in trouble

all I know is to bet the under every time they play...good defense...terrible offense...you decide
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:23 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.