Dark checkraised w/KK -- 5handed 20/40 at the Muckleshoot

[bobdibble]

Villain can be tough at times. In case anyone knows him, his name is Lee and he typically plays 30/60 with 50/100 overs at the Muck and I believe he plays 100/200+ at the Commerce. He's a ~50 year old black dude and usually wears a Berkeley t-shirt or sweatshirt.

I've only played with him twice, but here is my read... He defends his BB more than half the time, both short handed and full. He can be somewhat loose pre-flop when in position, or when completing/defending the blinds. He is tight in multiway pots post flop, but will call down with second pair, decent kicker when HU. He will get agressive on the flop with top pair, no-kicker. I don't know how he plays drawing hands when short handed.

On with the hand...

The game is 5 handed and just converted from 30/60 to 20/40 to try to pick up new players. This is my first orbit.

I'm dealt black kings UTG+1 and I raise. Folded to villain in the BB who calls.

Flop: 942 with 2 spades.

Villain checkraises, I 3-bet, villain calls.

Turn: villain checks dark.... T of uninteresting suit

I bet, villain checkraises.... plan?

[Joe Tall]

I'm still on the gas here, he has A9, fck him.

[tpir90036]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm still on the gas here, he has A9, fck him.

[/ QUOTE ]
Wouldn't this let a good player get away from a worse hand and jam us up with a better one? I think I would rather call the turn and raise the river.

[Joe Tall]

[ QUOTE ]

Wouldn't this let a good player get away from a worse hand and jam us up with a better one? I think I would rather call the turn and raise the river.

[/ QUOTE ]

Too often such a player realizes that A9 is no good anymore when you call the turn and they check/call the river. When you 3-bet the turn they still dont' fold as they feel too vested and often feel they are getting played back it.

[sfer]

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
I'm still on the gas here, he has A9, fck him.

[/ QUOTE ]
Wouldn't this let a good player get away from a worse hand and jam us up with a better one? I think I would rather call the turn and raise the river.

[/ QUOTE ]

There are also benefits to showing no fear with a 1-pair hand on the turn against someone you play regularly. For this particular hand, which, out of these two big-street lines you choose depends more on what you feel is important.

[bernie]

[ QUOTE ]
I'm still on the gas here, he has A9, fck him.

[/ QUOTE ]

LOL.

I like Bobbyi's idea. That's the first thing I thought of. Yes, the guy may see through it, but I'll find out how he reacts rather than just assume how he will. If he folds, this could also open him up for turn semi bluffs.

b

[bobdibble]

[ QUOTE ]
I like Bobbyi's idea. That's the first thing I thought of. Yes, the guy may see through it, but I'll find out how he reacts rather than just assume how he will. If he folds, this could also open him up for turn semi bluffs.

[/ QUOTE ]

That's a good point. I get maximum from this hand if he calls the power sequence, and if he folds I can use the info to maximize EV for the session.

[bobbyi]

I don't think I know the opponent.

What do you think about just calling his flop c/r and then eightyballing him on the turn? I take that line pretty often in spots like this against this sort of opponent in the muck 20 and like how it plays out (online, I am much more inclined to just three-bet the flop). I like the way it balances my play on the flop (since I could be calling a check-raise with either overcards or a big hand waiting to pop the turn) and on the turn (because if a blank hits and I raise, it's hard to tell if I slowplayed or if I am raising for a free s/d) and the line often wins the max against a draw here and against worse hands provided he isn't capable of folding to the turn raise, which a lot of people aren't.

[bobdibble]

[ QUOTE ]
What do you think about just calling his flop c/r and then eightyballing him on the turn?

[/ QUOTE ]

I take that line against weak/passive players that will shutdown and go into call mode if I 3-bet the flop. Against an agressive, thinking player the smooth-call/raise-turn line screams monster and can let them get away from a marginal hand.

Of course, I'll still take the smooth-call/raise-turn line about 25% of the time with monsters against thinking opponents so that I can also take the same line for a free showdown. And in those cases, if they 3-bet the turn, I'll often just call the 3-bet with a monster and raise the river since a turn 3-bet tells them that I'm not making the free showdown play and allows them to fold.

(Fyi, I took the smooth-call/raise-turn HU with a set of jacks v.s. Barry Greenstein in one of the limit WSOP events and it allowed him to get away from a pair of aces w/bad kicker. (I emailed him after the event to find out what he folded.) In fact, he folded rather than putting in his last BB into the pot and decided to wait for a better spot pre-flop to put in that last BB. That sort of solidified for me how obvious that line is.)

[private joker]

[ QUOTE ]
That sort of solidified for me how obvious that line is.

[/ QUOTE ]

Tangent...

That line is obvious to Barry Greenstein, but not to your average 20/40 player. Speaking of a set of jacks, I was playing 20/40 at Commerce last night and raised PF with JJ only to have the fish to my right weak lead into me on a flop of J75.

I smooth called and raised a 3 turn (part of the reason I did this was because we weren't heads up and I wanted overcalls from 3 other players in the hand; hoping they'd catch up to a hand only slightly worse than top set). He called the turn raise and check-called a 3 river.

When he called he said "I don't believe you," and after that I said, "full house." He goes, "Really?!!" and seemed shocked at my JJ. He turned to his friend who was sweating him and insulting him for giving me too much action. He told his friend that when I just called on the flop he assumed his hand was good, and that I was just making a move on the turn with AK.

So I think the line works good against the majority of mid-limit players. Against Barry, probably not.