Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 01-02-2005, 12:05 PM
bisonbison bisonbison is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: I will poop in your pillowcase.
Posts: 1,389
Default Re: Should I limp 22 UTG?

No

If you are playing micro-limits and you are folding 22 UTG, either A) you do not understand how good and easy this hand is or B) you are practicing lousy table selection.

So, I repeat: yes.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 01-02-2005, 12:21 PM
droolie droolie is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: In the butt Bob
Posts: 404
Default Re: Should I limp 22 UTG?

I thought you multitabled 3/6....

Easy fold. Right?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 01-02-2005, 12:29 PM
bisonbison bisonbison is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: I will poop in your pillowcase.
Posts: 1,389
Default Re: Should I limp 22 UTG?

I thought you multitabled 3/6.... Easy fold. Right?

No.

Let's say that you ranked the quality of all tables on a scale from 1-100. The made-up threshold at which limping 22 UTG is +EV is 65. Your average Party 3/6 table (of all the tables going at one time) is about a 60, give or take blah blah blah. Your average Party .5/1 table is an 85, and your average Party 1/2 10-max table is about a 75.

Now, understand that that is counting every shitty table that you should leave post-haste. With careful table selection, you can find 3/6 tables where limping 22 UTG is +EV, but it takes extraordinarily bad table selection (ala, I'm sitting in the 2+2 private game) to find a Party micro table where it isn't +EV.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 01-02-2005, 02:23 PM
Vern Vern is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 46
Default Re: Should I limp 22 UTG?

Yeah, because at the 2+2 private table, players typically straddle when UTG. You would then re-raise with 2+2 at UTG+1 to isolate the straddle. I don't bother to import those hands into PT as play is generally just silly.

Vern
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 01-02-2005, 02:49 PM
PokerBob PokerBob is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: St. Paul
Posts: 238
Default Re: Should I limp 22 UTG?

Isn't this a no-brainer? You are ahead of all but 12 hands. Plus, it's simple to get away from if you miss.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 01-02-2005, 02:54 PM
btspider btspider is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 39
Default Re: Should I limp 22 UTG?

[ QUOTE ]
Isn't this a no-brainer? You are ahead of all but 12 hands. Plus, it's simple to get away from if you miss.

[/ QUOTE ]

if its simple to get away from when you miss.. then are you really ahead of an agressive AK, etc?
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 01-02-2005, 03:37 PM
bisonbison bisonbison is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: I will poop in your pillowcase.
Posts: 1,389
Default Re: Should I limp 22 UTG?

it's not a no-brainer, and you're not really "ahead" of all but 12 hands You've only got a small edge against any unpaired overcards.

Anyhoo, I made this thread because limping small pairs in soft games seems to scare some people. And I wanted to establish that that is dumb.
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 01-02-2005, 03:48 PM
Upright Bill Upright Bill is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Western Michigan
Posts: 23
Default Re: Should I limp 22 UTG?

[ QUOTE ]
I thought you multitabled 3/6.... Easy fold. Right?

No.

Let's say that you ranked the quality of all tables on a scale from 1-100. The made-up threshold at which limping 22 UTG is +EV is 65. Your average Party 3/6 table (of all the tables going at one time) is about a 60, give or take blah blah blah. Your average Party .5/1 table is an 85, and your average Party 1/2 10-max table is about a 75.

Now, understand that that is counting every shitty table that you should leave post-haste. With careful table selection, you can find 3/6 tables where limping 22 UTG is +EV, but it takes extraordinarily bad table selection (ala, I'm sitting in the 2+2 private game) to find a Party micro table where it isn't +EV.

[/ QUOTE ]

So this leads to the question I've wanted to ask for a long time (well I've only been playing for 2 months so its not that long). I play 1/2 mostly at Party Poker. How do you select a proper table?

My original technique was to sort the tables by average pot size and get on the waiting list for the top 3-4. I can tell you now that that's not it. Now I click hide full tables, sort by average pot, and open (but do not join) the 4 in about the middle of the list (without scrolling down). I watch each one looking for 5+ people seeing the flop for at least 2 hands out of 3 or 4. If a table doesn't pass this check I close it and open the next one down. When I have 2 or 3 that pass this check I join the waiting list for each of them, sitting at the first table offered.

BTW, I almost always limp in UTG with 22.

Bill
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 01-02-2005, 05:55 PM
kiemo kiemo is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 205
Default Re: Should I limp 22 UTG?



Bison you seem to think Party is the only Poker site when blindly saying always limp.

Take that 22 UTG over to Stars, Absolute, or TGC and see how +EV it is limping with small pairs in EP on tables that have less then 30% to the flop. Maybe it is...
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 01-02-2005, 06:07 PM
__Q__ __Q__ is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: 3/6 hold\'em
Posts: 295
Default Re: Should I limp 22 UTG?

How about a thread on playing AK after missing the flop
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:02 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.