pokerstars vs. party results

PokerPaul · #1 05-09-2005, 10:29 AM

anyone else have vastly differrent results playing at these 2 sites?

I am finding that i have ammased enough hands between the two to safely say that my results are way poorer at stars....unfortuantely.

Don't know if its because my particular game choice is more scarce there, or the level of competition is greater, or something else, but its tough to ignore at this stage.

Anyone else have the same experience?

slickpoppa · #2 05-09-2005, 11:35 AM

I've never played the ring games at Stars, because just from looking at them they looked really tight. So your results are not surprising to me.

awval999 · #3 05-09-2005, 11:36 AM

I find it much easier to bluff at people on Stars (playing 3/6). While at Party playing (1/2 and 2/4) I just value bet. I honestly believe most of the players at Party are unbluffable.

OldYoda · #4 05-09-2005, 11:50 AM

[ QUOTE ]
Anyone else have the same experience?

[/ QUOTE ]

No. Actually, quite the opposite. After a little over 10,000 hands at Party I'm barely break even. With 4 times that many hands at Stars I'm up a great deal. Maybe it's just horses for courses - or maybe it says something about my style or my game. Just don't know what it is.

FishHooks · #5 05-09-2005, 12:22 PM

proboly has a lot to do with sample size

Perseus · #6 05-09-2005, 12:32 PM

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Anyone else have the same experience?

[/ QUOTE ]

No. Actually, quite the opposite. After a little over 10,000 hands at Party I'm barely break even. With 4 times that many hands at Stars I'm up a great deal. Maybe it's just horses for courses - or maybe it says something about my style or my game. Just don't know what it is.

[/ QUOTE ]

Ehh it's called variance. Over the last 15,000 hands I am up 3.5bb/100 are eurobet and up .05bb/100 at Multi.

Must be the different players [img]/images/graemlins/shocked.gif[/img]