Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Poker Discussion > Televised Poker
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 08-24-2005, 12:50 AM
shaniac shaniac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 168
Default Has anyone mentioned that Fischman played great?

I know that a lot of people around here seem to dislike him, but I thought he played amazing poker during the $1,500 NL tonight.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 08-24-2005, 01:03 AM
TomHimself TomHimself is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 299
Default Re: Has anyone mentioned that Fischman played great?

He played solid, surprised at how quick he fold 66 pf to a MPish raise i think.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 08-24-2005, 01:05 AM
istewart istewart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Baseball Preview Issue
Posts: 2,523
Default Re: Has anyone mentioned that Fischman played great?

It seemed good but come on, we saw like 6 hands he played.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 08-24-2005, 01:09 AM
shaniac shaniac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 168
Default Re: Has anyone mentioned that Fischman played great?

[ QUOTE ]
we saw like 6 hands he played.

[/ QUOTE ]

Yes but he played them really well. In each of them, he had to totally took control of really good players to win the pot. It was great NL. I understand your point about the paucity of hands we see, but Scott managed to put on a good show.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 08-24-2005, 01:11 AM
istewart istewart is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Baseball Preview Issue
Posts: 2,523
Default Re: Has anyone mentioned that Fischman played great?

I can agree with that.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 08-24-2005, 01:52 AM
sirio11 sirio11 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 11
Default Re: Has anyone mentioned that Fischman played great?

I didnt like the check in the turn with Alan when he has the full house.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 08-24-2005, 02:58 AM
shaniac shaniac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 168
Default Re: Has anyone mentioned that Fischman played great?

Why not?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 08-24-2005, 10:24 AM
DonT77 DonT77 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 186
Default Re: Has anyone mentioned that Fischman played great?

Fischman's flop bet might have looked like he was trying to buy the pot - as many will often do. Having failed to win the bet on the flop, many will check the turn - and often will be perceived as weak, thus enticing their opponent to either bet on 4th street or to put more chips into the pot than they otherwise would have on 5th street.

I think a turn check is quite standard here - I think it might get him a free card the next time he checks after a continuation bet (you'll want to leave doubt in your opponent's minds about what the turn check means in the future - strength or weakness) and he certainly isn't worried about giving a free card. What don't you like about the turn check here?
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 08-24-2005, 01:02 PM
sirio11 sirio11 is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: El Paso, TX
Posts: 11
Default Re: Has anyone mentioned that Fischman played great?

But you know the opponent was Allen Cunningham, right?

There is no standard play here, it depends on your opponent, versus Allen I think he could have won more chips if he bet the turn. Because with his play; check the turn and bet the river, he won exactly O extra chips.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 08-24-2005, 01:14 PM
shaniac shaniac is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New York City
Posts: 168
Default Re: Has anyone mentioned that Fischman played great?

[ QUOTE ]
But you know the opponent was Allen Cunningham, right?

[/ QUOTE ]

It's true you can't expect opponents like Allen to make a big mistake vs you, but I agree with Don's analysis that Scott's line was arguably the best way to induce a bluff/bet on the river.

I imagine you would have been even more unimpressed if he had just smooth-called the flop, like most players would have done instinctively.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:58 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.