Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Two Plus Two > Two Plus Two Internet Magazine
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-01-2005, 12:34 PM
Zetack Zetack is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 656
Default Which two books?

Mason says there are two 2+2 books that are frequently criticized for not being as good as they could be. Which two books are they?

--Zetack
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-02-2005, 06:37 AM
Freeway Freeway is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Copenhagen, Denmark
Posts: 3
Default Re: Which two books?

I was wondering that as well.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-02-2005, 12:05 PM
jdl22 jdl22 is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
Posts: 609
Default Re: Which two books?

TOP and either SCSFAP or HPFAP
[img]/images/graemlins/tongue.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-02-2005, 02:36 PM
phish phish is offline
Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Posts: 47
Default Re: Which two books?

I think Theory of Poker is excellent. The one 2+2 book I'm most disappointed in is High/Low (Omaha and Stud) for AP. The Omaha section is particularly weak.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-08-2005, 01:37 AM
alfatcat alfatcat is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 19
Default Re: Which two books?

Good place to ask this question would be the Books/Publications forum.


A REALLY good place to find the definitive answer to this question.

Oh, and I'm not trying to be one of those you're a loser if you haven't ready every post people, just saw this one recently and trying to help!
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.