Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > General Gambling > Psychology
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-29-2005, 08:57 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Professional vs 2nd Income

Based on a few months of browsing through posts on this and other forums, it seems that most poker professionals don't really enjoy the game anymore.

Given that anyone with the talent to go pro could also make a very nice side living while still holding down a job w/benefits, why do people choose to do this? Hate working for a boss? Like to set your own hours? Higher aspirations? Love the money too much to let go?

People who play professionally often complain on these forums of boredom, burnout, and unhealthy emotional swings. Wouldn't part-time play with a full-time or part-time job be healthier and add to your enjoyment of the game?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-29-2005, 09:51 PM
PokerAce PokerAce is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 385
Default Re: Professional vs 2nd Income

I was a software developer making a pretty healthy living before deciding to go pro earlier this year. The reason I quit my full time job was because I simply hated everything about it.

I hated getting up at 5:30-6 in the morning. I hated not getting home until 6 or later in the evening. I hated only getting a handful of hours every day to do what I wanted to do. I hated not getting enough sleep and being near exhausted all the time. On top of that, the work was mind numbingly boring and it wasn't a pleasant place to work.

Now, I get a full 8 hours of sleep every night so I'm rested and feeling good all day. I work whenever I feel like it and I have more "me" time than I've ever had in my life. The stress levels in my life are at an all time low (my hair has stopped thinning - no kidding! ... hopefully it decides to grow back some).

However, poker isn't always good. It does become a grind. Very quickly if you play enough of it. The downswings are harder to swallow if you rely on that money to pay the rent every month. You really have to love the game and be willing to fight through the difficult times.

For a while there, when I was growing thin on money and hitting a lot of rough variance, I was questioning my choice to go pro (I made the leap with not much in terms of savings). But the free time I had gave me a chance to develop PokerAce Hud and the success that it has brought me will allow me a second chance at the tables. A second chance I'm hoping to use to take me to the higher limits and allow me to pursue other investment interests.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-29-2005, 10:24 PM
JeanieJ JeanieJ is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 13
Default Re: Professional vs 2nd Income

Poker is rough when you play it day in and day out. It loses a good deal of the "fun" factor and picks up even more of the "work" factor.

For me it was more a personal choice. Spending more time with my husband (who also plays for a living), and being able to have the freedom that doesn't come with a job. Both money and time wise.

Some people are happy making a 2nd income, you'll find those who play for a living have reasons other than money. We're all human. Yeah, money is nice, but it's more than that for most people.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-29-2005, 10:28 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Professional vs 2nd Income

Interesting that you and your husband both play. I've always wondered about households where the spouses share a profession. Do you even talk poker or do you avoid the topic?

I don't make anything more than a middle class living, but I think it would be very hard to replace my salary plus the benefits I would lose (not that I'm capable of going pro). It just seems like such a hard way to make a living. Can you deduct your losses and other expenses?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-29-2005, 10:50 PM
JeanieJ JeanieJ is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 13
Default Re: Professional vs 2nd Income

Assuming you pay taxes.

We talk poker. We argue about poker. What else would we argue about? [img]/images/graemlins/grin.gif[/img]
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-30-2005, 10:07 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Professional vs 2nd Income

[ QUOTE ]
People who play professionally often complain on these forums of boredom, burnout, and unhealthy emotional swings.

[/ QUOTE ]

People complain all the time about their jobs, usually to people that they work with. Who is an online poker player going to complain to? "Dude, I'm just taking a beating this week," he says to a friend. Friend replies "Dude, you don't have a job, what are you complaining about?" Misery loves company and an ear that understands...this is one place to find it.

I also think that many of the people who are attracted to becoming a professional gambler are predisposed to some of the negative behaviors you mention. The fact that we spend massive amounts of time alone, in front of a computer(or at a table where everyone around us is an adversary) doesn't help.

[ QUOTE ]
Wouldn't part-time play with a full-time or part-time job be healthier and add to your enjoyment of the game?

[/ QUOTE ]

I think that for many of us it would.

It does amaze me though, from posts I've seen on this site, how many people here are trying to do healthy things for themselves, who think about saving for the future, who plan ahead.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-30-2005, 10:45 AM
Warren Whitmore Warren Whitmore is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: New Hampshire
Posts: 224
Default Re: Professional vs 2nd Income

"Any man who would give up even a little bit of freedom for a little bit of security shall recieve niether of either which is exactly what he derserves." -Benjamin Franklin

"I want you to realize that virtually all men experience the same conflict that you do, and that we all move back and forth from demanding greater freedom to demanding greater security." -Alan Schoonmaker

I have done some unofficial research from all of the greats in thier field. Paul McCartney, Thomas Edison, Warren Buffett, Benjamin Franklin and loads of others. What I have found is that all of them have chosen 100% freedom over security and that is a big factor determining why they got to the top of thier fields. They did not work for anyone else. They did not yield to pressures legal or social.

That makes me think poker full time is the way to go. But alas in the end I agree with Mr Schoonmaker. All of those great folks represent about one tenth of one percent of the population. If you are that great than full time (24 hours a day 7 days a week) is the ticket to the top. If not I think the part time road is a lot better.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-30-2005, 11:33 AM
Kurn, son of Mogh Kurn, son of Mogh is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Cranston, RI
Posts: 4,011
Default Re: Professional vs 2nd Income

Based on a few months of browsing through posts on this and other forums, it seems that most poker professionals don't really enjoy the game anymore

News Flash!!! Most people who work "normal" jobs for a living don't really enjoy it much after a while either.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-30-2005, 12:57 PM
Raven Raven is offline
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 6
Default Re: Professional vs 2nd Income

[ QUOTE ]
"Any man who would give up even a little bit of freedom for a little bit of security shall recieve niether of either which is exactly what he derserves." -Benjamin Franklin


[/ QUOTE ]

Too much civ 4 ?
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-30-2005, 12:59 PM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: Professional vs 2nd Income

[ QUOTE ]


News Flash!!! Most people who work "normal" jobs for a living don't really enjoy it much after a while either.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well aren't you the smart one?

Yeah, I understand that. Which is why I asked the question to begin with, jackass. If a "real" job and playing poker end up being much the same, then why would someone choose such a tough and unstable path?

Every thread has an idiot just like you, jumping in with some uninformed, unoriginal comment that's designed to be funny, but isn't. It's like an entire army of socially retarded clones running around desperately trying to assert their relevance.

Here's the newsflash: you're tiresome. Now STFU. The adults are having a discussion.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:37 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.