#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: 2+2 Tourney - Hand 1
[ QUOTE ]
I'm not sure I follow the 4th street 3-bet, but if you explain your reasoning I might agree with it. [/ QUOTE ] If I had solid reasoning, I'd give it. But I don't think it was there. I felt it had turned into a stud high game because I don't think he would continue jamming after the brick (and the flush outs are already quite dead). And all I really know about stud high is to watch out when the door card is paired. I was hoping to give him enough incentive to get away from his high hand by representing trips. |
|
|