#1
|
|||
|
|||
please tell me why this isn\'t an error in party\'s software
why does WinstonSomme get to raise again after DEETEE goes all in for .73 more than a $2 bet?
***** Hand History for Game 3003659181 ***** $25 PL Omaha - Tuesday, November 08, 17:08:19 EDT 2005 Table Table 65457 (Real Money) Seat 1 is the button Total number of players : 10 Seat 1: WinstonSomme ( $22.50 ) Seat 2: poppos ( $8.95 ) Seat 4: boss46 ( $30.42 ) Seat 5: MoxNix ( $14 ) Seat 7: cart5r ( $10.46 ) Seat 9: DEETEE ( $5.48 ) Seat 10: ME ( $47.60 ) Seat 8: Bills_420 ( $14.25 ) Seat 3: MNparks ( $4.75 ) Seat 6: vssd210 ( $24.75 ) poppos posts small blind [$0.10]. MNparks posts big blind [$0.25]. ** Dealing down cards ** MoxNix calls [$0.25]. vssd210 folds. cart5r calls [$0.25]. Bills_420 calls [$0.25]. DEETEE calls [$0.25]. ME calls [$0.25]. WinstonSomme calls [$0.25]. poppos calls [$0.15]. MNparks raises [$0.50]. MoxNix calls [$0.50]. cart5r calls [$0.50]. Bills_420 calls [$0.50]. DEETEE calls [$0.50]. ME calls [$0.50]. WinstonSomme calls [$0.50]. poppos calls [$0.50]. ** Dealing Flop ** [ 7h, 9c, 8h ] poppos checks. MNparks bets [$2]. MoxNix folds. cart5r folds. Bills_420 calls [$2]. DEETEE calls [$2]. ME raises [$4]. WinstonSomme calls [$4]. poppos folds. MNparks is all-In [$2] Bills_420 folds. DEETEE is all-In [$2.73] ME calls [$0.73]. WinstonSomme is all-In [$17.75] ME folds. ** Dealing Turn ** [ Th ] ** Dealing River ** [ As ] MNparks shows [ Qs, Ah, Qh, 4s ] a flush, ace high. DEETEE shows [ 7s, 2c, 7d, Ts ] three of a kind, sevens. WinstonSomme shows [ Jd, Tc, 2s, Kc ] a straight, seven to jack. WinstonSomme wins $17.02 from side pot #2 with a straight, seven to jack. WinstonSomme wins $2.09 from side pot #1 with a straight, seven to jack. MNparks wins $22.80 from the main pot with a flush, ace high. |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: please tell me why this isn\'t an error in party\'s software
Umm....Isn't it POT Limit? Can't you bet the size of the pot at any time?
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
Re: please tell me why this isn\'t an error in party\'s software
[ QUOTE ]
Umm....Isn't it POT Limit? Can't you bet the size of the pot at any time? [/ QUOTE ] yes, but why is betting reopened to WinstonSomme? |
#4
|
|||
|
|||
Re: please tell me why this isn\'t an error in party\'s software
known glitch.
|
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: please tell me why this isn\'t an error in party\'s software
[ QUOTE ]
known glitch. [/ QUOTE ] do you know what makes it happen? why haven't they fixed it? |
#6
|
|||
|
|||
Re: please tell me why this isn\'t an error in party\'s software
Interesting. I have played much Pot and NL ring games on party and never encountered that. I'd email their support about it and see what their response is.
PG |
#7
|
|||
|
|||
Re: please tell me why this isn\'t an error in party\'s software
why wouldn't it be? isn't the .73 cents a raise?
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: please tell me why this isn\'t an error in party\'s software
Why is this a bug? Winston doesn't raise himself, he just calls. If he had raised, he should naturally not be able to reraise, but since he just called, action is opened to him again.
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
Re: please tell me why this isn\'t an error in party\'s software
It's a bug because the action should not be re-opened on a "raise" that is less than the amount of the original raise.
The all in player is effectively calling, not raising, and therefor Winston shouldn't have the option or re-raising. This is definately a glitch in the software. |
#10
|
|||
|
|||
Re: please tell me why this isn\'t an error in party\'s software
so WinstonSomme should only be able to call .73 cents? i see what you're saying, but it doesn't make sense to me. what if the guy had been all-in for one cent less than the previous bet. that would essentially have been a full raise, but, by what you're saying, later players, like WinstonSomme, would only be able to call... how is that fair?
|
|
|