This will rip your heart out - just an amazing flop - not a whine

[Webster]

Normally a 3/6 player but was doing a Rake study on the Crypto Micro tables and seeing how a friend is crushing these guys to the tune of 12.5BB/100 after 3500 hands.

THANK GOD this was not in 3/6 or 5/10


Game #742646544: Texas Hold'em Limit (£0.50/£1) - 2005/07/29 - 03:48:42 (UK)
Table "Quanoon" Seat 8 is the button.
Seat 1: Rooneybea (£17.73 in chips)
Seat 2: hogic (£39.85 in chips)
Seat 3: Erikblood (£61.27 in chips)
Seat 4: Mavriking (£4.74 in chips)
Seat 5: Playert (£42.95 in chips)
Seat 6: Foote31 (£61.50 in chips)
Seat 7: Londinium (£61.55 in chips)
Seat 8: Hero (£39.75 in chips)
Seat 9: jimyc2001 (£28.20 in chips)
Seat 10: Kaz250 (£24.46 in chips)
jimyc2001: posts small blind £0.25
Kaz250: posts big blind £0.50
----- HOLE CARDS -----
dealt to Hero [5d Ad]
3 fold
Erikblood: calls £0.50
fold
fold
Londinium: calls £0.50
Hero: calls £0.50
jimyc2001: calls £0.25
Kaz250: checks
----- FLOP ----- [4s 3c 2c]
jimyc2001: bets £0.50
Kaz250: raises £1
Erikblood: calls £1
fold
Hero: raises £2
jimyc2001: calls £1.50
Kaz250: calls £1
Erikblood: calls £1
Londinium: calls £0.50
----- TURN ----- [4s 3c 2c][Qs]
jimyc2001: bets £1
Kaz250: raises £2
Erikblood: folds
Londinium: raises £3
Hero: raises £4
jimyc2001: calls £3
Kaz250: calls £2
Londinium: calls £1
----- RIVER ----- [4s 3c 2c Qs][Kd]
jimyc2001: checks
Kaz250: bets £1
Londinium: raises £2
Hero: raises £3
jimyc2001: calls £3
Kaz250: calls £2
Londinium: raises £2
Javajunqi: calls £1
jimyc2001: calls £1
Kaz250: calls £1
----- SHOW DOWN -----
Londinium: shows [5s 6s] (A Straight, Six high)
Javajunqi: shows [5d Ad] (A Straight, Five high)
jimyc2001: mucks hand - HE had a set

Londinium collected £42.75 from Main pot
----- SUMMARY -----

BTW - rake is ABOUT 3.7BB/100 for each player.

Grinderswarehouse - NOT just another BLOG

[Entity]

This hand is severely overplayed IMO.

[Webster]

you think I over played that?? i KNOW 100% that if I was at my normal limit I would have back down a tiny bit but still. Overplayed??

I kept thinking I was over playing it but geez - what could beat be except for 56.

[deception5]

It's got to be close with 2 players padding the pot that you have odds to cap every street even if you're hoping for a split with another player.

[Iron Tigran]

[ QUOTE ]
you think I over played that?? i KNOW 100% that if I was at my normal limit I would have back down a tiny bit but still. Overplayed??

I kept thinking I was over playing it but geez - what could beat be except for 56.

[/ QUOTE ]

This post confuses me. It seems written by two people...

[Webster]

I was - the "play money" micro table Webster and the "scared Money" 5/10 Webster,

[crunchy1]

[ QUOTE ]
This hand is severely overplayed IMO.

[/ QUOTE ]
I disagree. The only street I'd consider overplayed is the river. Up until this point I don't see any reason to slow down with all those players padding the pot. We're only losing to 56.

I'd call 3-betting the river after both previous players are still showing aggression overplaying that street but, I don't think you can refer to the entire hand as overplayed.

[Webster]

Perhaps it was because I was at this limit and it really did not feel like real money going out of my pocket.

THose guys at Crypto Micros are so . . . .crazy!

[Vote4Pedro]

[ QUOTE ]
Perhaps it was because I was at this limit and it really did not feel like real money going out of my pocket.

[/ QUOTE ]

nice

[Webster]

Well - it was true LOL you play at $3/6 and $5/10 and then go to that level you can take a LOT of beats and not feel it [img]/images/graemlins/smile.gif[/img] Not cutting players at that limit - just how I felt.

You see - I don't play online totally for money - I love the game at all levels - the money part is just a bonus!!