|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars bigger than Party, gotta Love it! :)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] Lots of time's I am playing at a 6 max table with less than 6 players on it, so the rake gets capped at $2. So I shouldn't be punished for the situations where rake cannot reach $3. [/ QUOTE ] You might want to rethink this last sentence. [/ QUOTE ] Your right -- I worded that badly. What I mean, is that the number of FPP's should increase with the amount of rake paid -- It shouldn't give out x at $1 and x*2 at $3 -- it should go up incremenetly with the amount of rake paid. (I was in no way advocating that the $2 cap is bad). |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Stars bigger than Party, gotta Love it! :)
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ] [ QUOTE ] Lots of time's I am playing at a 6 max table with less than 6 players on it, so the rake gets capped at $2. So I shouldn't be punished for the situations where rake cannot reach $3. [/ QUOTE ] You might want to rethink this last sentence. [/ QUOTE ] Your right -- I worded that badly. What I mean, is that the number of FPP's should increase with the amount of rake paid -- It shouldn't give out x at $1 and x*2 at $3 -- it should go up incremenetly with the amount of rake paid. (I was in no way advocating that the $2 cap is bad). [/ QUOTE ] I'll take any increase at all. |
|
|