Two Plus Two Older Archives  

Go Back   Two Plus Two Older Archives > Limit Texas Hold'em > Micro-Limits
FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10-21-2005, 11:36 AM
Watain Watain is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Denmark
Posts: 103
Default Re: 99 vs 65/11/2

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Fold.

If we assume AA-JJ, AK and AQs as the starting hand then we are ahead the following %-age of the time:

Behind: AA+KK+QQ+JJ+AK = 6+1+6+6+8
In front of: AQs = 4

4/31 = 13%.

13% would in itself justify to continue. But since this is just the flop, we would most often pay some big bets to get to showdown. And even if he have AQ he still have 6 outs twice.

-------------

Lets try the same, but this time we expand his card range to include AQo.

Behind: AA+KK+QQ+JJ+AK = 6+1+6+6+8
In front of: AQo = 16

16/43 = 37% !!

This would be a calldown i would think. Lets say you have 30% equity (due to his 6 outs). And we assume he bets all way and you call him down.

The pot would be 11.75 at showdown where you had to pay 2,5 to call him down. You expect to win 30% of the pot = 3.5. And you had to pay 2,5.

EV: 3,5-2,5 = 1.

---------

Based on these calculations it seems like a calldown is in place if you suspect him to have AQx in his likely pf capping range.

Did I screw this up? [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Any AQ combination still has 13 outs going to the river. Hearts has even more.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, i did adjust for this by reducing the equity from 37 to 30. Maybe itīs not enough?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10-21-2005, 11:42 AM
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default Re: 99 vs 65/11/2

[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
[ QUOTE ]
Fold.

If we assume AA-JJ, AK and AQs as the starting hand then we are ahead the following %-age of the time:

Behind: AA+KK+QQ+JJ+AK = 6+1+6+6+8
In front of: AQs = 4

4/31 = 13%.

13% would in itself justify to continue. But since this is just the flop, we would most often pay some big bets to get to showdown. And even if he have AQ he still have 6 outs twice.

-------------

Lets try the same, but this time we expand his card range to include AQo.

Behind: AA+KK+QQ+JJ+AK = 6+1+6+6+8
In front of: AQo = 16

16/43 = 37% !!

This would be a calldown i would think. Lets say you have 30% equity (due to his 6 outs). And we assume he bets all way and you call him down.

The pot would be 11.75 at showdown where you had to pay 2,5 to call him down. You expect to win 30% of the pot = 3.5. And you had to pay 2,5.

EV: 3,5-2,5 = 1.

---------

Based on these calculations it seems like a calldown is in place if you suspect him to have AQx in his likely pf capping range.

Did I screw this up? [img]/images/graemlins/laugh.gif[/img]

[/ QUOTE ]

Any AQ combination still has 13 outs going to the river. Hearts has even more.

[/ QUOTE ]

Well, i did adjust for this by reducing the equity from 37 to 30. Maybe itīs not enough?

[/ QUOTE ]

Oh, I didn't see this was a calculation on the flop. Given the turn J, and expanding the range to include TT and AJ, wouldn't this be a clear fold?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10-21-2005, 01:16 PM
Watain Watain is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Denmark
Posts: 103
Default Re: 99 vs 65/11/2

Sure. I was trying to figure out what to do on the flop.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:50 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.